Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis Prediction (S. Mulé)

Working Together: Radiology at the Heart of Care

SAT, APRIL 5, 2025
3:00 - 4:30 PM

Navigating Cancer Care: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Complications with Shared Patient Journey

Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis Prediction
Speaker: Sébastien Mulé

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of this presentation, participants will be able to:

Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information.
Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers.

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate how well the learning objectives were met. After attending the presentation Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis Prediction, I am able to:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).	Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Strongly Disagree	Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Disagree	Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Agree	Identify the diagnostic value of imaging features for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Strongly Agree
Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information.	Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information. Strongly Disagree	Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information. Disagree	Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information. Agree	Distinguish the potential of imaging features to provide useful prognostic information. Strongly Agree
Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers.	Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers. Strongly Disagree	Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers. Disagree	Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers. Agree	Discuss the limitations of translating these prognostic imaging features into clinically applicable prognostic markers. Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which CanMEDS you felt were effectively addressed during the presentation.

Collaborator

Communicator

Health Advocate

Leader

Medical Expert

Professional

Scholar

Question Title

* 3. Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives.	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Strongly Disagree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Disagree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Agree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Strongly Agree
The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging.	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Strongly Disagree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Disagree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Agree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Strongly Agree
The information was relevant to my practice.	The information was relevant to my practice. Strongly Disagree	The information was relevant to my practice. Disagree	The information was relevant to my practice. Agree	The information was relevant to my practice. Strongly Agree
The amount of material covered was appropriate.	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Strongly Disagree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Disagree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Agree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Strongly Agree
There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content.	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Strongly Disagree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Disagree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Agree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 4. Did you perceive any commercial or industry bias?

Yes

Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis Prediction (S. Mulé)

Working Together: Radiology at the Heart of Care

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate how well the learning objectives were met. After attending the presentation Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis Prediction, I am able to:

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which CanMEDS you felt were effectively addressed during the presentation.

Question Title

* 3. Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements

Question Title

* 4. Did you perceive any commercial or industry bias?

Question Title

* 5. If yes, please comment

Question Title

* 6. Please list any practice changes you will make after attending this lecture.

Question Title

* 7. What do you wish your colleagues knew about this topic?

Question Title

* 8. What would you like to learn more about?