Screen Reader Mode Icon

Hearing Officer/Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Evaluation

To the extent possible, please complete the survey in an objective manner independent of your preferred final outcome. 

Question Title

* 1. Name of the ALJ/Hearing Officer and Case Type

  Hearing Officer Case Type
Hearing Officer Name/Case Type

Question Title

* 2. My Role at the Hearing

Question Title

* 3. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ was knowledgeable of the relevant law in the subject matter of the hearing you attended?

Question Title

* 4. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ was well-prepared for the hearing?

Question Title

* 5. Regardless of whether you agreed with any particular ruling or the final result, were you satisfied overall that the hearing officer/ALJ applied hearing rules/procedures fairly to all parties?

Question Title

* 6. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ explained the hearing process in an understandable manner?

Question Title

* 7. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ engaged respectfully and professionally with hearing participants?

Question Title

* 8. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ maintained appropriate control/decorum of the hearing?

Question Title

* 9. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ was attentive to testimony and arguments?

Question Title

* 10. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ allowed the parties at the hearing to make appropriate/non-repetitive arguments and objections?

Question Title

* 11. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ efficiently used hearing time and kept the overall hearing process on track?

Question Title

* 12. Were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ refraind from and prohibited others from engaging in bias based on race, religion, ethnicity, culture, ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, disability, or socioeconomic status during the hearing process?

Question Title

* 13. Regardless of whether you agreed with the final result, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ decided the case based upon the evidence presented?

Question Title

* 14. Regardless of whether you agreed with the orders or final decision, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ prepared an order or decision that resolved each relevant issue presented?

Question Title

* 15. Regardless of whether you agreed with the ultimate conclusion, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ's orders and decision contained sufficient legal analysis, explanation, and citation/discussion of supporting authority?

Question Title

* 16. Regardless of whether you agreed with the orders/decision, were you satisfied that the hearing officer/ALJ's order/decision was well-written and understandable?

Question Title

* 17. Considering the complexity of the  issues and case, were you satisfied with the timeliness of orders/rulings/decision in the case?

0 of 27 answered
 

T