AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 61 Evaluation

Workshop 61: Revised Guidelines for Psychological Evaluations in Child Protection Matters

This workshop provides an overview of the American Psychological Association’s newly revised Guidelines for Psychological Evaluations in Child Protection Matters. New developments that prompted this revision will be reviewed in detail, including those related to racial bias concerns, the impact of structural racism, multicultural considerations, kinship placement, and updated research. Participants will discuss innovations across various types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. Advice concerning child as well as adult assessment methodologies will be explored in detail, with a particular emphasis on the importance of effective communication with evaluees, attorneys, and the courts.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations.	1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations. 1	1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations. 2	1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations. 3	1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations. 4	1. Identify three different ways in which diversity and equity concerns affect the performance of child protection evaluations. 5
2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations.	2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. 1	2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. 2	2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. 3	2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. 4	2. Gain familiarity with two distinct types of court-ordered child protection evaluations. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Helen T. Brantley, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Eric Y. Drogin, PhD, JD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Jemour A. Maddux, PsyD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 5. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 61 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Helen T. Brantley, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Eric Y. Drogin, PhD, JD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Jemour A. Maddux, PsyD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 5. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 6. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 8. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 9. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 10. Additional Comments