AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 48 Evaluation

Workshop 48: The Art and Science of Collaborating with Parenting Time Professionals

Parenting time professionals are important team members for court involved families facing parent-child contact challenges. Well-trained, qualified parenting time professionals can provide a range of services to families that require supervised parent-child contact as determined by the court. Case examples will be used to outline and inform the participants about the range of supervised parent time services available, the limitations of the parenting time professional, how best to collaborate with them, and what training and qualifications could be considered when choosing a provider.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts.	1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts. 1	1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts. 2	1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts. 3	1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts. 4	1. Articulate and identify the varying levels of interventions in supervised parent/child contacts. 5
2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals.	2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals. 1	2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals. 2	2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals. 3	2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals. 4	2. Consider why, when, and how to collaborate and with parenting time professionals. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Howard D. Yaffe, MSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Lori L. Wymore-Kirkland, MPA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Joe Nullet, BA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 5. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 48 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Howard D. Yaffe, MSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Lori L. Wymore-Kirkland, MPA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Joe Nullet, BA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 5. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 6. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 8. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 9. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 10. Additional Comments