AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 35 Evaluation

Workshop 35: Lausanne Trialogue Play in Child-Parent Rejection: The Italian Systemic Approach

This hands-on workshop will explore the nuances of family dynamics through the lens of the Italian systemic-relational approach. Learn how the innovative Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be employed in parenting coordination to address relational dysfunction in high conflict families, including those facing the devastating reality of a child rejecting a parent. Using case studies and video analysis, the presenters will delve into the effectiveness and practical application of LTP in parenting coordination, offering a transformative perspective on familial relationships.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination.	1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination. 1	1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination. 2	1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination. 3	1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination. 4	1. Describe the key components of the Italian systemic-relational approach to family dynamics, and how the Lausanne Trialogue Play (LTP) technique can be used in effective parenting coordination. 5
2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent.	2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent. 1	2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent. 2	2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent. 3	2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent. 4	2. Analyze the application of LTP in addressing relational dysfunction within high-conflict family scenarios, and the impact of LTP in cases where a child exhibits rejection towards a parent. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Conny Leporatti (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Francesca Lemmi (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 35 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Conny Leporatti (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Francesca Lemmi (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments