AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 33 Evaluation

Workshop 33: Tending to the Wellbeing of Those Who Look After Others in the Courtroom

Family law professionals working at the front-end of the family law system have the closest contact with litigants thus exposing themselves to the risk of stress, burnout, vicarious trauma, and mental health issues. Protecting their well-being requires a multi-faceted, interdisciplinary, evidence-based, policy-driven, institutional approach. Interventions must be personal and organizational. Culture change, strong leadership and effective communication is critical. In this workshop, the presenters will share practical strategies for supporting the wellbeing of frontline family law professionals and the organizations in which they serve.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being.	1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being. 1	1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being. 2	1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being. 3	1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being. 4	1. Identify and explain the wellbeing impacts of working in a stressful family law environment and of strategies to better manage well-being. 5
2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace.	2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace. 1	2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace. 2	2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace. 3	2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace. 4	2. Explain the benefits of a systematic, policy informed, organizational and personal response to the wellbeing challenges of a family law workplace. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Hon. Tom Altobelli (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Robyn Bradey, B.Soc.Stud. (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 33 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Hon. Tom Altobelli (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Robyn Bradey, B.Soc.Stud. (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments