AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 29 Evaluation

Workshop 29: Gaining Control Amidst Intimate Partner Violence, High-Conflict Couples, and Addiction

This session will examine how family dispute resolution processes can benefit couples with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV), allowing each party to have power and control over the outcome of their divorce and their future, rather than placing their fate in the hands of a judge. Presenters will focus on how to navigate the challenges and tailor the team-approach for productive outcomes in high-conflict scenarios. Participants will gain insight into recognizing indicators of IPV, fostering safe communication, and prioritizing safety and empowerment.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree.	1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree. 1	1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree. 2	1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree. 3	1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree. 4	1. Navigate the ADR process in cases involving IPV by applying the tools and skills necessary so the family can thrive post-decree. 5
2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns.	2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns. 1	2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns. 2	2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns. 3	2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns. 4	2. Identify signs of IPV, assess its impact on the ADR process, and develop strategies for creating a safe and constructive environment for all parties involved; this includes tailoring the Collaborative team members to most effectively address the family’s goals and concerns. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Beth F. McCormack, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Jason N. Sposeep, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 29 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Beth F. McCormack, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Jason N. Sposeep, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments