Exit

Plenary Session: Depolarizing by Example: AFCC Peace Talks on Parent-Child Contact Problems
This plenary focuses on an innovative peace talk strategy to break down polarization of issues related to parent-child contact problems (PCCP) by emphasizing collaborative dialogue. This transformative approach will be showcased among experts across the continuum of perspectives, who will examine the many factors to consider in assessing and intervening in PCCP. Presenters will discuss their substantive analyses along with methods to improve understanding, communication, and collaboration. This session will provide a roadmap for family law professionals to effectively address complex contact problems, foster cooperation, enhance professional and public education, develop needed resources, and ultimately benefit the well-being of children and their families.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Discuss the historical and ongoing conflict polarization.
2. Identify three areas of agreement in three areas of disagreement.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: William Bernet, MD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: April Harris-Britt, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Peter Jaffe, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Hon. Denise McColley (Ret.) (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 6. Please rate presenter: Stacey E. Platt, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 7. Please rate moderator: Michael A. Saini, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 8. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 9. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 10. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 11. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 12. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 13. Additional Comments

T