AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 56 Evaluation

Workshop 56: Online Meetings with Children: Is it a Thing?

If there was one lesson learned from the pandemic, it was how to pivot. In-room service approaches had to move online. Meeting with children proved to be a bit harder. The pandemic offered opportunities to develop new approaches for safe and meaningful online meetings with a child. Children who live in rural and remote locations may now benefit from the lessons of 2021. Through video examples, this workshop outlines three strategies for consideration in determining how, when, and why an online meeting with a child might be the best option.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged.	1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged. 1	1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged. 2	1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged. 3	1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged. 4	1. Describe the times when meeting with a child through online processes is more advantageous than delaying the meeting until an in-room session can be arranged. 5
2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings.	2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings. 1	2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings. 2	2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings. 3	2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings. 4	2. List 3 considerations when approaching whether to engage with a child in online meetings. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Lorri A. Yasenik, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Jonathan M. Graham, LLB (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

AFCC 61st Annual Conference Workshop 56 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Lorri A. Yasenik, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Jonathan M. Graham, LLB (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments