Workshop 17: The Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation – Revisited
It has been more than twenty years since the last revision of the Model Standards, and an AFCC and American Bar Association task force is in the process of updating them. Participants in this session will explore proposed changes, provide feedback, and have an opportunity to make suggestions for the revisions. Participants will: (1) review the Model Standards; (2) explore ways that family and divorce mediation have changed since the last revision; and (3) evaluate proposed modifications and updates to the Model Standards.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Understanding the role of technology in family mediation.
2. Understanding the principle of self-determination of participants in family mediation.
3. Review the Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation
4. Explore ways that family and divorce mediation have changed since the Model Standards were last revised.
5. Evaluate proposed modifications and updates to the Model Standards

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Donna Erez-Navot, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Susan E. Guthrie, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Stacy D. Heard, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Nancy Ver Steegh, JD, MSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 6. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 7. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 8. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 9. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 10. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 11. Additional Comments

T