Institute 5: Child Sexual Abuse in Custody Cases
This institute will focus on the considerable challenges of addressing allegations of child sexual abuse in the context of child custody litigation. The program will explore cutting-edge research, law, policy, and practice from the bench to the bar, and for mental health practitioners involved in various forensic capacities. Presenters will explore how to understand what is true about allegations, recognizing the various levels of unsupportable claims, how to analyze facts, and how to make good decisions and recommendations. Topics include: missteps due to misconceptions; context for understanding when and how reports of abuse arise in custody matters; assessing reports of abuse; assessing professionals' qualifications and work product; custody arrangements depending on the outcome of reported abuse.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Differentiate between the myths and facts about the incidence and validity of child sexual abuse allegations in the custody/visitation context.
2. Discuss why child sexual abuse may begin or first be disclosed at divorce.
3. Discuss why binary thinking about these allegations -- they are either true or false – is flawed and compromises accurate assessment in some cases.
4. Assess the interviewing techniques of others, including Child Protective Services, prosecutors, and mental health professionals.
5. Identify how to assess and make temporary and permanent recommendations about custody and visitation that promote the best interests of the child rather than the needs of the parents, in the wake of child sexual abuse allegations.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Seth L. Goldstein, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Mindy F. Mitnick, MEd, MA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Commissioner Joanne Brown (Ret.) (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 6. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 8. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 9. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 10. Additional Comments

T