Exit

AFCC Peace Talks: Reflecting on Progress and Engaging Feedback
The AFCC Peace Talks, launched in 2023, have been a powerful strategy in depolarizing parent-child contact problems (PCCP) issues. The talks have fostered a culture of collaborative dialogues among experts with diverse perspectives. This interactive session will build on the plenary held in June of 2024 at the AFCC 61st Annual Conference by encouraging participants to engage with presenters and reflect on key achievements and lessons learned from the AFCC Peace Talks. Participants will play a vital role in this collaborative process, engaging in meaningful discussions, sharing their feedback and experiences in the ongoing efforts to depolarize PCCP issues. The presenters are eager to gather these diverse perspectives, recognizing their importance in enhancing future peace talks. This collaborative approach is key to fostering continuous improvement and effective depolarization in family law.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

  1 2 3 4 5
Discuss diverse perspectives to further a collaborative approach to foster effective depolarization in family law.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: April Harris-Britt, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Peter Jaffe, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Hon. Denise McColley (Ret.) (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Stacey E. Platt, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 6. Please rate moderator: Michael A. Saini, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 7. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 8. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 9. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 10. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 11. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 12. Additional Comments

T