16th Symposium on Child Custody: Workshop 6 Evaluation

It Takes a Village – Fostering Community Partnerships Judicial Track

Principal 10 of the Cady Justice Reform Initiative discusses the importance of obtaining necessary community support and partnerships. Presenters will discuss how Johnson County community partnerships and multidisciplinary collaborations have helped provide crucial intervention services, offering families a sense of choice, empowerment, and collaboration essential for effective trauma-informed care that seeks to maximize restorative practices. Participants will leave the workshop inspired and motivated to encourage and foster community partnerships and collaboration in their local communities.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court.	1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court. 1	1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court. 2	1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court. 3	1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court. 4	1. Discuss the importance of community partnerships in achieving a problem-solving court. 5
2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities.	2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities. 1	2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities. 2	2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities. 3	2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities. 4	2. Apply ideas to invite and engage community partnerships in their communities. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Trina A. Nudson, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Heather Landon, MSW, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

16th Symposium on Child Custody: Workshop 6 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Trina A. Nudson, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Heather Landon, MSW, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments