Parenting Coordination and Arbitration: Monitoring for Safety and Wellbeing with Quasi-Judicial Authority
Practitioners in the neutral roles face distinct challenges when screening and assessing for safety and wellbeing in family relationships. These challenges can take on an extra layer of complexity when the practitioner’s role is quasi-judicial in nature. The presenters review the scope of some neutral roles, as well as considerations and challenges when considering the safety of their client family members. Ongoing controversies regarding the rendering of recommendations and decisions, as well as the differing perspectives of the courts on the delegation of judicial authority, will be discussed. Practical strategies for screening and assessing for safety and wellbeing in family relationships will be compared to some of the lesser-discussed guidelines presented in the AFCC’s Guidelines for Examining Intimate Partner Violence.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Understand relevant considerations and challenges when considering the safety of family members in parenting coordination or other similar neutral and/or adjudicative roles.
2. Learn practical strategies for screening and assessing for safety and wellbeing in family relationships in parenting coordination or other similar neutral and/or adjudicative roles.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Terry Singh, PhD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Wayne Barkauskas, KC (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments

T