16th Symposium on Child Custody: Workshop 1 Evaluation

Should I Persist When My Child Resists?

Enforcing parenting time amid resistance poses a daunting challenge. Forcing the child's compliance risks escalation, while not enforcing may signal abandonment. Conflicting advice from professionals adds chaos. When to persist or step back hinges on various factors, demanding a nuanced approach. This workshop offers a model for decision making based on expert insights and collaborative exploration. Whether a seasoned practitioner or newcomer, attendees will depart with actionable strategies for navigating the complexities of resistance to parenting time and implementing realistic interventions for the family.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent.	1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. 1	1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. 2	1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. 3	1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. 4	1. Identify the primary requirements for persisting toward parenting time when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. 5
2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time.	2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time. 1	2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time. 2	2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time. 3	2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time. 4	2. Identify 3 red flags that signal a resisted parent to back off enforcing time. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Leslie Drozd, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Amy Armstrong, LISW-S (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

16th Symposium on Child Custody: Workshop 1 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Leslie Drozd, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Amy Armstrong, LISW-S (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments