No Professional is an Island: How to Effectively (or Successfully) Coordinate Multiple Roles in Family Court Proceedings
Join this panel for a comprehensive exploration of the diverse roles within family law cases. Discover effective strategies for coordinating these roles to promote successful outcomes for families and learn how to manage conflicts and challenges that may arise along the way. Whether you're a therapist, parenting coordinator, attorney, guardian, or case expert, this institute will focus on best practices related to confidentiality issues, understanding authorizations for information release, identifying effective team leadership to guide families, and fostering collaboration while maintaining ethical boundaries. Enhance your skills and knowledge in effectively navigating the complexities of court-involved families.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Recognize the various roles within court-involved families, understanding both their scope and limitations.
2. Outline effective strategies for coordinating a treatment team that supports forward progress for court-involved families.
3. Anticipate and manage potential conflicts that arise when working within a team approach with court-involved families, employing strategies to address and mitigate these challenges.
4. Identify ethical dilemmas inherent in therapeutic teamwork with court-involved families, and develop methods to navigate and resolve these dilemmas.
5. Distinguish between approaches that may exacerbate family chaos and conflict, and alternative strategies to promote positive changes within the family system.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate presenter: Christy Bradshaw Schmidt, MA, LPC (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Victoria T. Harvey, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Sandra L. Mayberry, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Lori A. Love, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 6. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 7. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 8. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 9. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 10. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 11. Additional Comments

T