16th Symposium on Child Custody: Institute 3 Evaluation

Advanced Issues in Mediation
This interactive institute will include a discussion of a variety of issues, dynamics, techniques, and approaches that have impacted mediation practice. Topics will include: family-focused mediation, addressing differing parenting styles, PCCP, the role of GALs, protocols and safe practices in cases with IPV dynamics and others! The panel will introduce Settlement Week, a court managed program that has reduced court backlog through mediation and offer tips for setting up such a program in other jurisdictions. From niche solutions to case management to AI, learn also about the next wave of technology tools to adapt and integrate into mediation practice.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach.	1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach. 1	1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach. 2	1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach. 3	1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach. 4	1. Identify at least 2 techniques for a family-focused mediation approach. 5
2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions.	2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions. 1	2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions. 2	2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions. 3	2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions. 4	2. Discuss the purpose of integrating other professionals into the mediation process and specific sessions. 5
3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions.	3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions. 1	3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions. 2	3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions. 3	3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions. 4	3. Discuss the Ohio Settlement Week Program and how to develop a similar program in other jurisdictions. 5
4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process.	4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process. 1	4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process. 2	4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process. 3	4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process. 4	4. Identify protocols and tools for assessment for maintain safety during the mediation process. 5
5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI.	5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI. 1	5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI. 2	5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI. 3	5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI. 4	5. Review technology tools that have and will impact mediation practice, including the use virtual sessions and AI. 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate moderator: Marya Cody Kolman, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Christy Cumberlander Walker, MPA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Wendi Stern, MBA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Amy Armstrong, LISW-S (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 6. Please rate presenter: Gary Doernhoefer, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 7. Please rate presenter: Magistrate Larry McQuain (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 8. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

16th Symposium on Child Custody: Institute 3 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this session, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

Question Title

* 2. Please rate moderator: Marya Cody Kolman, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Christy Cumberlander Walker, MPA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Wendi Stern, MBA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Amy Armstrong, LISW-S (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Please rate presenter: Gary Doernhoefer, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Please rate presenter: Magistrate Larry McQuain (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 8. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the symposium brochure

Question Title

* 9. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 10. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 11. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 12. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 13. Additional Comments