AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Overall Evaluation

2019 AASECT Annual Conference Overall Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how would you rate the 2019 AASECT Annual Conference?

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 2. Which of the following describes your professional work in the field of sexuality?

Administrator

Counselor

Educator

Health Educator

Social Worker

Therapist

DO Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine

MD Doctor of Medicine

Nurse

Nurse Practitioner

Physician Assistant

Psychologist

Student

Other (Please specify)

Question Title

* 3. Was this your first AASECT Annual Conference?

Yes

Question Title

* 4. How did you hear or learn about this conference?

Flyer / Postcard

Ad (in print material)

Conference Website

E-Mail / eBlast

Other

Question Title

* 5. How many years have you worked in the field of sexuality?

1-5

6-10

11-15

16-20

21-25

26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

46-50

50+

Question Title

* 6. What is the highest degree (not licensure) you have earned?

High School Diploma

Associate's Degree

Bachelor's Degree (BA, BS, etc.)

Master's Degree (MA, MS, MSW, MEd, etc.)

Advanced Degree (PhD, EdD, MD, DO, JD, etc.)

Other (Please specify)

Question Title

* 7. Are you licensed to practice professionally?

Yes

N/A

If yes, what field?

Question Title

* 8. What AASECT region do you reside?

Eastern Region (CT, DE, FL, GA, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, SC, VT, VA, WV, DC)

Mid-continent Region (AL, AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, ND, OH, OK, SD, TN, TX, WI)

Western Region (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)

International (Puerto Rico and countries other than the United States)

Question Title

* 9. OBJECTIVES
In thinking about the overall objectives of the AASECT Annual Conference, please answer the following questions.
This Conference met the stated objectives of:

	Strongly disagree 1	Disagree 2	Neither agree or disagree 3	Agree 4	Strongly agree 5
To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices	To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices Strongly disagree 1	To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices Disagree 2	To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices Neither agree or disagree 3	To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices Agree 4	To identify established ideals and emerging visions of sexuality that weave together traditional and innovative practices Strongly agree 5
To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research	To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research Strongly disagree 1	To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research Disagree 2	To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research Neither agree or disagree 3	To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research Agree 4	To promote intergenerational discussions on best practices by sharing different methods of teaching, exploring sexuality in therapy and studying collaborations in sexuality research Strongly agree 5
To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism	To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism Strongly disagree 1	To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism Disagree 2	To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism Neither agree or disagree 3	To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism Agree 4	To tackle tomorrow’s challenges by mentoring emerging leaders and addressing diversity, globalization, advocacy and activism Strongly agree 5

Question Title

* 10. Which session / presentation did you find the most worthwhile? Please list the title and presenter(s) name, as well as why you feel it was the most worthwhile.

Question Title

* 11. Which session / presentation did you find the least worthwhile? Please list the title and presenter(s) name, as well as why you feel it was the least worthwhile.

Question Title

* 12. What was the key reason/driver influencing your decision to attend AASECT's 2019 Annual Conference?

Conference Location

Networking Opportunities

Exhibit Hall

Pre-conference Workshop Offerings

Conference Workshops/Educational Programming

Continuing Education Credits

Other (Please specify)

Question Title

* 13. Please evaluate the following:

	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	Poor	N/A
Pre-conference Workshops	Pre-conference Workshops Excellent	Pre-conference Workshops Good	Pre-conference Workshops Satisfactory	Pre-conference Workshops Fair	Pre-conference Workshops Poor	Pre-conference Workshops N/A
Plenary Sessions	Plenary Sessions Excellent	Plenary Sessions Good	Plenary Sessions Satisfactory	Plenary Sessions Fair	Plenary Sessions Poor	Plenary Sessions N/A
Poster Session	Poster Session Excellent	Poster Session Good	Poster Session Satisfactory	Poster Session Fair	Poster Session Poor	Poster Session N/A
Dialogue Panel Presentations	Dialogue Panel Presentations Excellent	Dialogue Panel Presentations Good	Dialogue Panel Presentations Satisfactory	Dialogue Panel Presentations Fair	Dialogue Panel Presentations Poor	Dialogue Panel Presentations N/A
Research Panel Presentations	Research Panel Presentations Excellent	Research Panel Presentations Good	Research Panel Presentations Satisfactory	Research Panel Presentations Fair	Research Panel Presentations Poor	Research Panel Presentations N/A
Original Research Sessions	Original Research Sessions Excellent	Original Research Sessions Good	Original Research Sessions Satisfactory	Original Research Sessions Fair	Original Research Sessions Poor	Original Research Sessions N/A
Social Events	Social Events Excellent	Social Events Good	Social Events Satisfactory	Social Events Fair	Social Events Poor	Social Events N/A
Networking Opportunities	Networking Opportunities Excellent	Networking Opportunities Good	Networking Opportunities Satisfactory	Networking Opportunities Fair	Networking Opportunities Poor	Networking Opportunities N/A
Annual Conference Mobile App	Annual Conference Mobile App Excellent	Annual Conference Mobile App Good	Annual Conference Mobile App Satisfactory	Annual Conference Mobile App Fair	Annual Conference Mobile App Poor	Annual Conference Mobile App N/A
Meeting Facilities	Meeting Facilities Excellent	Meeting Facilities Good	Meeting Facilities Satisfactory	Meeting Facilities Fair	Meeting Facilities Poor	Meeting Facilities N/A
Bookstore	Bookstore Excellent	Bookstore Good	Bookstore Satisfactory	Bookstore Fair	Bookstore Poor	Bookstore N/A
Special Interest Groups	Special Interest Groups Excellent	Special Interest Groups Good	Special Interest Groups Satisfactory	Special Interest Groups Fair	Special Interest Groups Poor	Special Interest Groups N/A
Regional Meeting	Regional Meeting Excellent	Regional Meeting Good	Regional Meeting Satisfactory	Regional Meeting Fair	Regional Meeting Poor	Regional Meeting N/A
Business Meeting	Business Meeting Excellent	Business Meeting Good	Business Meeting Satisfactory	Business Meeting Fair	Business Meeting Poor	Business Meeting N/A

Comment(s):

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the overall cost of the conference:

	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	Poor	N/A
Conference registration	Conference registration Excellent	Conference registration Good	Conference registration Satisfactory	Conference registration Fair	Conference registration Poor	Conference registration N/A
Pre-conference workshops	Pre-conference workshops Excellent	Pre-conference workshops Good	Pre-conference workshops Satisfactory	Pre-conference workshops Fair	Pre-conference workshops Poor	Pre-conference workshops N/A
Social events	Social events Excellent	Social events Good	Social events Satisfactory	Social events Fair	Social events Poor	Social events N/A
Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi)	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) Excellent	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) Good	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) Satisfactory	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) Fair	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) Poor	Miscellaneous (food, transportation, hotel wifi) N/A

Question Title

* 15. Please evaluate your experience with the following aspects of the conference:

	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	Poor	N/A
Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference Excellent	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference Good	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference Satisfactory	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference Fair	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference Poor	Submission of conference proposal to the 2019 conference N/A
Online registration prior to the conference	Online registration prior to the conference Excellent	Online registration prior to the conference Good	Online registration prior to the conference Satisfactory	Online registration prior to the conference Fair	Online registration prior to the conference Poor	Online registration prior to the conference N/A
Onsite registration at time of conference	Onsite registration at time of conference Excellent	Onsite registration at time of conference Good	Onsite registration at time of conference Satisfactory	Onsite registration at time of conference Fair	Onsite registration at time of conference Poor	Onsite registration at time of conference N/A
Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs Excellent	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs Good	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs Satisfactory	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs Fair	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs Poor	Correspondence with 2019 Conference Co-chairs N/A
Correspondence with AASECT Staff	Correspondence with AASECT Staff Excellent	Correspondence with AASECT Staff Good	Correspondence with AASECT Staff Satisfactory	Correspondence with AASECT Staff Fair	Correspondence with AASECT Staff Poor	Correspondence with AASECT Staff N/A

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the following aspects of the overall conference program:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	N/A
What I learned will be valuable to me in my work.	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. Strongly Agree	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. Agree	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. Neutral	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. Disagree	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. Strongly Disagree	What I learned will be valuable to me in my work. N/A
Most presentations were related to my work.	Most presentations were related to my work. Strongly Agree	Most presentations were related to my work. Agree	Most presentations were related to my work. Neutral	Most presentations were related to my work. Disagree	Most presentations were related to my work. Strongly Disagree	Most presentations were related to my work. N/A
I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues.	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. Strongly Agree	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. Agree	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. Neutral	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. Disagree	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. Strongly Disagree	I would recommend future AASECT programs to my colleagues. N/A

Comment(s):

Question Title

* 17. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Very Little
1

Great Deal
5

Very Little
1

Great Deal
5

Question Title

* 18. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Not Useful
1

Extremely Useful
5

Not Useful
1

Extremely Useful
5

Question Title

* 19. What topics would you like to see offered as a pre-conference workshop, as well as be willing to pay to attend, for 2020?

Question Title

* 20. Who would you recommend to present a pre-conference workshop at the 2020 conference?

Question Title

* 21. Who would you recommend to present a keynote at the 2020 conference?

Question Title

* 22. What is your preferred session length at the conference? Please rank from 1 (most preferred) - 5 (least preferred).

30 minutes

45 minutes

60 minutes

90 minutes

2 hours

Question Title

* 23. What other types of program formats would you like to see the Conference Program Planning Committee consider for 2019? (Please check all that apply.)

Symposia

Roundtables

Speed Networking

Other (Please specify)

Question Title

* 24. Would you be willing to pay for conference session recordings should AASECT offer an option like this at a future conference?

Yes

Maybe

Question Title

* 25. Do you plan to attend the 2020 AASECT Conference in Palm Springs, CA?

Yes

Maybe

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how would you rate the 2019 AASECT Annual Conference?

Question Title

* 2. Which of the following describes your professional work in the field of sexuality?

Question Title

* 3. Was this your first AASECT Annual Conference?

Question Title

* 4. How did you hear or learn about this conference?

Question Title

* 5. How many years have you worked in the field of sexuality?

Question Title

* 6. What is the highest degree (not licensure) you have earned?

Question Title

* 7. Are you licensed to practice professionally?

Question Title

* 8. What AASECT region do you reside?

Question Title

* 9. OBJECTIVES In thinking about the overall objectives of the AASECT Annual Conference, please answer the following questions. This Conference met the stated objectives of:

Question Title

* 10. Which session / presentation did you find the most worthwhile? Please list the title and presenter(s) name, as well as why you feel it was the most worthwhile.

Question Title

* 11. Which session / presentation did you find the least worthwhile? Please list the title and presenter(s) name, as well as why you feel it was the least worthwhile.

Question Title

* 12. What was the key reason/driver influencing your decision to attend AASECT's 2019 Annual Conference?

Question Title

* 13. Please evaluate the following:

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the overall cost of the conference:

Question Title

* 15. Please evaluate your experience with the following aspects of the conference:

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the following aspects of the overall conference program:

Question Title

* 17. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Question Title

* 18. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Question Title

* 19. What topics would you like to see offered as a pre-conference workshop, as well as be willing to pay to attend, for 2020?

Question Title

* 20. Who would you recommend to present a pre-conference workshop at the 2020 conference?

Question Title

* 21. Who would you recommend to present a keynote at the 2020 conference?

Question Title

* 22. What is your preferred session length at the conference? Please rank from 1 (most preferred) - 5 (least preferred).

Question Title

* 23. What other types of program formats would you like to see the Conference Program Planning Committee consider for 2019? (Please check all that apply.)

Question Title

* 24. Would you be willing to pay for conference session recordings should AASECT offer an option like this at a future conference?

Question Title

* 25. Do you plan to attend the 2020 AASECT Conference in Palm Springs, CA?

Question Title

* 26. What could we have done to make this a better conference experience for you?

Question Title

* 27. Additional comments or suggestions:

* 9. OBJECTIVES
In thinking about the overall objectives of the AASECT Annual Conference, please answer the following questions.
This Conference met the stated objectives of: