Listener feedback for Conversations at the Perimeter

We hope you've enjoyed the first two seasons of Conversations at the Perimeter! We'd like to gather a little more information about our audience's preferences as we chart the path forward. We'd appreciate you taking a couple minutes to share your feedback.

1.What level of difficulty do you enjoy when listening to a science/tech podcast?

I prefer simple, non-technical explanations of science.

I enjoy scientific discussions that make my brain ache a bit with challenging concepts.

I like deep, difficult science discussions. No topic is too complex. Bring it on!

2.What is your preferred episode length for a science podcast?

20 minutes or less

30 minutes is my ideal

60 minutes to really dig into a topic

Longer than 60 minutes if the interview is really good!

3.Does this podcast inspire you to find out more about science?

Yes

4.Please let us know the type(s) of episode content you enjoy. (Choose all that apply)

Theoretical physics

Experimental physics

Applied physics and technology

The intersection of scientific fields

Broader scientific content (biology, Earth sciences, etc.)

Personal stories about scientists’ lives and motivations

Other (please specify)

5.Are there any topics or questions that you would like us to consider for a future episode?

6.What other podcasts do you enjoy?

7.Please provide any other feedback, questions, or suggestions for Conversations at the Perimeter.

See how easy it is to create surveys and forms.

Privacy & Cookie Notice