2021 Gross Pathology - Friday Davis-Thompson Foundation Seminar Evaluation Form Please answer the following questions. It will help us to put together future symposia that will be in line with the interests of the attendees. Question Title * 1. What is your specialty? Anatomic Pathologist Clinical Pathologist Anatomic Pathology Trainee Clinical Pathology Trainee Clinician Veterinary Student Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. Faculty evaluation Interest of subject to me Organization of lecture Presentation of lecture Illustration of lecture Dr. Cianciolo Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Cianciolo Interest of subject to me menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Cianciolo Organization of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Cianciolo Presentation of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Cianciolo Illustration of lecture menu Dr. Jennings Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Jennings Interest of subject to me menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Jennings Organization of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Jennings Presentation of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Jennings Illustration of lecture menu Dr. Murphy Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Murphy Interest of subject to me menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Murphy Organization of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Murphy Presentation of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Murphy Illustration of lecture menu Dr. Corps Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Corps Interest of subject to me menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Corps Organization of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Corps Presentation of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Corps Illustration of lecture menu Dr. Oglesbee Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Oglesbee Interest of subject to me menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Oglesbee Organization of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Oglesbee Presentation of lecture menu Excellent Very good Average Below average Poor Dr. Oglesbee Illustration of lecture menu Question Title * 3. This year’s Gross Pathology Course was delivered on a virtual format. How strongly to you agree or disagree with the following statements: Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. Strongly agree The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. Agree The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. Neither agree nor disagree The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. Disagree The virtual course delivery format was useful and efficient. Strongly disagree The Canvas course website was well organized. The Canvas course website was well organized. Strongly agree The Canvas course website was well organized. Agree The Canvas course website was well organized. Neither agree nor disagree The Canvas course website was well organized. Disagree The Canvas course website was well organized. Strongly disagree The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. Strongly agree The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. Agree The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. Neither agree nor disagree The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. Disagree The materials provided on the Canvas course website were of use to me. Strongly disagree Mock exam #1 was useful. Mock exam #1 was useful. Strongly agree Mock exam #1 was useful. Agree Mock exam #1 was useful. Neither agree nor disagree Mock exam #1 was useful. Disagree Mock exam #1 was useful. Strongly disagree Mock exam #2 was useful. Mock exam #2 was useful. Strongly agree Mock exam #2 was useful. Agree Mock exam #2 was useful. Neither agree nor disagree Mock exam #2 was useful. Disagree Mock exam #2 was useful. Strongly disagree Question Title * 4. This year’s Gross Pathology Review was presented in a hybrid format, organized by organ system for domestic animals and species for special species. Which would you recommend for future courses? Species Organ system Combination of species and organ system Comments: Question Title * 5. Please cast your vote for the best lecturer, and recipient of the Samuel W. Thompson Lectureship Award, for the 2021 Gross Pathology Review Course. Dr. La Perle (Mice & Rats; Mock Exams) Dr. Knoblaugh (Rabbits, Other Rodents & Ferrets) Dr. Borst (Poultry) Dr. Keesler (Nonhuman Primates) Dr. Shive (Fish) Dr. Terio (Amphibians, Reptiles, Zoo/Exotic Animals, Wildlife & Birds) Dr. Corps (Musculoskeletal & Nervous) Dr. Premanandan (Reproductive & Ocular) Dr. Schreeg (Gastrointestinal) Dr. Durham (Hematolymphoid) Dr. Stromberg (Respiratory) Dr. Kohnken (Cardiovascular) Dr. Cianciolo (Urinary) Dr. Jennings (Integumentary) Dr. Murphy (Endocrine) Dr. Oglesbee (Nervous) Question Title * 6. Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding the format of the 2021 Gross Pathology Review Course. Question Title * 7. What is your overall evaluation of the course? Question Title * 8. ***Optional: You can opt to provide your contact information (Name and email) in case you want to participate in a monthly draw to receive a free registration for any paid DTF webinar*** Name Email Address Done
