2023 Symposium Evaluation: Advanced Study - Controversies in Treatment for Transgender Youth 3-11-2023

Elyse Pine, MD

Expanding Gender Affirming Health Care Symposium 2023

Question Title

* 1. A complete evaluation is required in order to earn Continuing Education credit and or a Certificate of Completion for this session. Please enter your first and last name.

Question Title

* 2. How much time did you spend taking this session (hours and minutes)

Question Title

* 3. How well the instructor cover each of these Learning Objectives:?

	Excellent	Good	Neutral	Fair	Poor
Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults	Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults Excellent	Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults Good	Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults Neutral	Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults Fair	Explore ethical issues in providing medical and surgical care for gender diverse children, adolescents, and adults Poor
Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care	Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care Excellent	Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care Good	Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care Neutral	Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care Fair	Recognize fallacies and misperceptions that interfere with evidence based care Poor
Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks	Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks Excellent	Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks Good	Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks Neutral	Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks Fair	Review clinical controversies over issues such as “watchful waiting”, “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”, early treatment with puberty blockers, the informed consent model, and cancer risks Poor

Comments:

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the overall quality of this session:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
This session was useful and relevant to my practice	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Strongly Agree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Agree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Neutral	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Disagree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Strongly Disagree
This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Strongly Agree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Agree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Neutral	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Disagree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Strongly Disagree
Content was current and well organized	Content was current and well organized Strongly Agree	Content was current and well organized Agree	Content was current and well organized Neutral	Content was current and well organized Disagree	Content was current and well organized Strongly Disagree
The instructional materials were suitable and useful	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Strongly Agree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Agree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Neutral	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Disagree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Strongly Disagree
Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Strongly Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Neutral	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Strongly Disagree
Questions and interaction were encouraged	Questions and interaction were encouraged Strongly Agree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Agree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Neutral	Questions and interaction were encouraged Disagree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Strongly Disagree
Course technology was user-friendly	Course technology was user-friendly Strongly Agree	Course technology was user-friendly Agree	Course technology was user-friendly Neutral	Course technology was user-friendly Disagree	Course technology was user-friendly Strongly Disagree
I would recommend this training to a colleague	I would recommend this training to a colleague Strongly Agree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Agree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Neutral	I would recommend this training to a colleague Disagree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Strongly Disagree

Comments:

Question Title

* 5. What did you enjoy most about this session?

Question Title

* 6. What would you change about this session?

Question Title

* 7. Additional comments about this session: