2018 ICJR Revision Hip & Knee Course

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the ICJR Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty Significantly Met	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty Somewhat Met	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty Not Met
Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Significantly Met	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Somewhat Met	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Not Met
Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc., when revision surgery is indicated	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc., when revision surgery is indicated Significantly Met	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc., when revision surgery is indicated Somewhat Met	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc., when revision surgery is indicated Not Met
Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Significantly Met	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Somewhat Met	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Not Met
Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Significantly Met	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Somewhat Met	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Not Met
Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Significantly Met	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Somewhat Met	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Not Met
Evaluate reconstructive options that allow management of bone loss with restoration	Evaluate reconstructive options that allow management of bone loss with restoration Significantly Met	Evaluate reconstructive options that allow management of bone loss with restoration Somewhat Met	Evaluate reconstructive options that allow management of bone loss with restoration Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 1: Fundamentals of Revision THA

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Excellent	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Very Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Fair	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Poor
Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Excellent	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Very Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Fair	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MoM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Poor
Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Excellent	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Very Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Fair	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Poor
Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Excellent	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Very Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Fair	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Poor
Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Excellent	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Very Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Fair	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Poor
David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Excellent	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Very Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Fair	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Poor
Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Excellent	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Very Good	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Good	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Fair	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 2: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability	Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability Excellent	Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability Very Good	Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability Good	Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability Fair	Aseptic Loosening; Trunionosis; Instability Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 3: Femoral Revision

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview Excellent	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview Very Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview Fair	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and Management of Femoral Bone Loss, Stem Selection - An Overview Poor
Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Excellent	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Very Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Fair	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Poor
Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Excellent	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Very Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Fair	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Poor
R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Excellent	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Very Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Fair	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Poor
James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Excellent	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Very Good	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Good	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Fair	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee Course speakers
Session 4: Acetabular Revision

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Excellent	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Very Good	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Good	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Fair	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Poor
Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video)	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Excellent	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Very Good	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Good	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Fair	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Poor
David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video)	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Excellent	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Very Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Fair	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Poor
Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video)	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Excellent	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Very Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Fair	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Poor
Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants?	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants? Excellent	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants? Very Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants? Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants? Fair	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic Discontinuity: Distraction with Augments, Plates, Cages or Custom Implants? Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee speakers
Session 5: THA Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA Excellent	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA Very Good	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA Good	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA Fair	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures After THA Poor
Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention Excellent	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention Very Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention Fair	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, Role for I&D Component Retention Poor
Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique)	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Excellent	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Very Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Fair	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Poor
Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange?	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange? Excellent	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange? Very Good	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange? Good	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange? Fair	Kevin L. Garvin, MD - On the Fringe: Any Evidence for Single Stage or Partial Two-Stage Exchange? Poor
Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Excellent	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Very Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Fair	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 7: Fundamentals of Revision TKA

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques)	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Excellent	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Very Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Fair	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Poor
Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA)	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Excellent	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Very Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Fair	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Poor
Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.)	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.) Excellent	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.) Very Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.) Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.) Fair	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (Implant Choices, Bone Loss, Stems, etc.) Poor
Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Excellent	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Very Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Fair	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-Operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Poor
Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques)	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Excellent	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Very Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Fair	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing Exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 8: Managing Bone Loss

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Excellent	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Very Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Fair	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Poor
Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique	Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Excellent	Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Very Good	Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Good	Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Fair	Jay R. Lieberman, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Poor
Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video)	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video) Excellent	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video) Very Good	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video) Good	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video) Fair	Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS - Management of Bone Loss: Porous Tantalum Cones (video) Poor
Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video)	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video) Excellent	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video) Very Good	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video) Good	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video) Fair	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Stepped Modular Sleeves (video) Poor
Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video)	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video) Excellent	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video) Very Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video) Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video) Fair	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: Lobed Porous Titanium Cones (video) Poor
Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Excellent	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Very Good	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Good	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Fair	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Poor
Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples	Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Excellent	Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Very Good	Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Good	Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Fair	Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 10: TKA Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Excellent	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Very Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Fair	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Poor
Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications	Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications Excellent	Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications Very Good	Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications Good	Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications Fair	Thomas L. Bernasek, MD - Component Retention: Indications Poor
Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video)	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video) Excellent	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video) Very Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video) Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video) Fair	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: Surgical Technique Video) Poor
Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique)	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Excellent	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Very Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Fair	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Poor
George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Excellent	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Very Good	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Good	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Fair	George J. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Poor
Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Excellent	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Very Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Fair	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 11: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss	Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss Excellent	Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss Very Good	Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss Good	Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss Fair	Topics: Flexion Instability, Infection, Bone Loss Poor

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 12: Extensor Mechanism

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Excellent	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Very Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Fair	Richard W. McCalden, MD, FRCSC - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Poor
James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Excellent	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Very Good	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Good	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Fair	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Poor
Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video)	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Excellent	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Very Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Fair	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Poor
Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video)	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Excellent	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Very Good	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Good	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Fair	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Poor

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 13: Miscellaneous

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Excellent	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Very Good	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Good	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Fair	Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Poor
Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Excellent	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Very Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Fair	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Poor
Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Excellent	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Very Good	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Good	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Fair	Jason M. Jennings, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Poor
James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only?	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Excellent	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Very Good	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Good	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Fair	James I. Huddleston III, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Poor
Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Excellent	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Very Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Fair	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Poor

Question Title

* 21. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 22. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 23. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 24. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 25. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 26. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education (FORE) and the International Congress for Joint Reconstruction (ICJR). FORE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 15.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credits commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the number of credit hours you've earned below. (min. 0.25- max 15.50)

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the ICJR Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers Session 1: Fundamentals of Revision THA

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakersSession 2: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakersSession 3: Femoral Revision

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee Course speakersSession 4: Acetabular Revision

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee speakers Session 5: THA Complications

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakersSession 7: Fundamentals of Revision TKA

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakersSession 8: Managing Bone Loss

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakersSession 10: TKA Complications

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers Session 11: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers Session 12: Extensor Mechanism

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers Session 13: Miscellaneous

Question Title

* 21. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 22. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 23. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 24. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 25. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the ICJR Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 1: Fundamentals of Revision THA

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 2: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 3: Femoral Revision

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee Course speakers
Session 4: Acetabular Revision

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Hip & Knee speakers
Session 5: THA Complications

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 7: Fundamentals of Revision TKA

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 8: Managing Bone Loss

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 10: TKA Complications

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 11: Interactive Small Group Case Discussions

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 12: Extensor Mechanism

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our ICJR Winter Course speakers
Session 13: Miscellaneous