2018 Current Solutions in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Apply innovative methods of assessment and management to various shoulder and elbow disorders	Apply innovative methods of assessment and management to various shoulder and elbow disorders Significantly Met	Apply innovative methods of assessment and management to various shoulder and elbow disorders Somewhat Met	Apply innovative methods of assessment and management to various shoulder and elbow disorders Not Met
Apply current concepts to total elbow arthroplasty	Apply current concepts to total elbow arthroplasty Significantly Met	Apply current concepts to total elbow arthroplasty Somewhat Met	Apply current concepts to total elbow arthroplasty Not Met
Consider the post-operative complications and outcomes following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty	Consider the post-operative complications and outcomes following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Significantly Met	Consider the post-operative complications and outcomes following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Somewhat Met	Consider the post-operative complications and outcomes following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Not Met
Identify humeral and glenoid bone loss and develop strategies to manage as they relate to anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty	Identify humeral and glenoid bone loss and develop strategies to manage as they relate to anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Significantly Met	Identify humeral and glenoid bone loss and develop strategies to manage as they relate to anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Somewhat Met	Identify humeral and glenoid bone loss and develop strategies to manage as they relate to anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Not Met
Develop strategies for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears	Develop strategies for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Significantly Met	Develop strategies for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Somewhat Met	Develop strategies for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Not Met
Access the options for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears	Access the options for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Significantly Met	Access the options for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Somewhat Met	Access the options for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION III: Elbow Session,

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow?	Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow? Excellent	Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow? Very Good	Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow? Good	Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow? Fair	Josh Dines, MD - What do I do differently in the thrower's elbow? Poor
Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads?	Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads? Excellent	Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads? Very Good	Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads? Good	Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads? Fair	Mark Morrey, MD - What have I changed in terrible triads? Poor
Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures?	Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures? Excellent	Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures? Very Good	Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures? Good	Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures? Fair	Michael McKee, MD - What is new in internal fixation for distal humerus fractures? Poor
Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant	Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant Excellent	Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant Very Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant Fair	Thomas Wright, MD - Infected TEA: When to Resect, When to Retain Implant, and When to Re-implant Poor
Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion	Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion Excellent	Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion Very Good	Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion Good	Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion Fair	Mark Mighell, MD Mark Morrey, MD Michael McKee, MD - Elbow Surgery: A Case-Based Discussion Poor
Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair Excellent	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair Very Good	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair Good	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair Fair	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Distal biceps tendon repair Poor
Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow	Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow Excellent	Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow Very Good	Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow Good	Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow Fair	Mark Morrey, MD - Arthroscopic release for the stiff elbow Poor
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture Excellent	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture Very Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture Fair	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Total elbow arthroplasty for fracture Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION IV: Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning Excellent	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning Very Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning Fair	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Computer assisted preoperative planning Poor
Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure Excellent	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure Very Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure Fair	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Optimizing glenoid exposure Poor
Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better Excellent	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better Very Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better Fair	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (osteotomy) - How I do it - why it’s better Poor
Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better	Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better Excellent	Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better Very Good	Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better Good	Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better Fair	Mark Mighell, MD - Debate: Subscapularis management (peel)- How I do it - why it’s better Poor
Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty	Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty Excellent	Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty Very Good	Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty Good	Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty Fair	Andrew Green, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- ream and run hemiarthroplasty Poor
Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total Excellent	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total Very Good	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total Good	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total Fair	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Debate: Anatomic arthroplasty in young active patients- total Poor
Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment Excellent	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment Very Good	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment Good	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment Fair	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- augment Poor
Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse Excellent	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse Very Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse Fair	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: B2 Glenoid- reverse Poor
Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless Excellent	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless Very Good	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless Good	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless Fair	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Debate: Humerus- stemless Poor
David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem	David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem Excellent	David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem Very Good	David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem Good	David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem Fair	David Dines, MD - Debate: Humerus- stem Poor
Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know Excellent	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know Very Good	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know Good	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know Fair	Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Outpatient total shoulder- What you need to know Poor
G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation	G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation Excellent	G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation Very Good	G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation Good	G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation Fair	G. Dean Harter, MD - Anatomic Arthroplasty Case Presentation Poor
Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where	Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where Excellent	Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where Very Good	Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where Good	Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where Fair	Heinz Hoenecke, MD Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Panel Discussion on Anatomic Total Shoulder: When, How, Where Poor
Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury Excellent	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury Very Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury Fair	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Nerve injury Poor
Mark Frankle, MD- Instability	Mark Frankle, MD- Instability Excellent	Mark Frankle, MD- Instability Very Good	Mark Frankle, MD- Instability Good	Mark Frankle, MD- Instability Fair	Mark Frankle, MD- Instability Poor
Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection	Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection Excellent	Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection Very Good	Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection Good	Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection Fair	Lynn Crosby, MD - Infection Poor
Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening	Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening Excellent	Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening Very Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening Fair	Thomas Wright, MD - Glenoid loosening Poor
Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus	Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus Excellent	Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus Very Good	Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus Good	Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus Fair	Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Stress shielding of the humerus Poor
Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Excellent	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Very Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Fair	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Mark Frankle, MD Lynn Crosby, MD Thomas Wright, MD Heinz Hoenecke, MD - Panel Discussion on Complications of Anatomic Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Poor
David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty	David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty Excellent	David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty Very Good	David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty Good	David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty Fair	David Dines, MD - The Future of Shoulder Arthroplasty Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION V: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale	Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale Excellent	Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale Very Good	Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale Good	Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale Fair	Mark Frankle, MD - Lateralized Design Rationale Poor
Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale Excellent	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale Very Good	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale Good	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale Fair	Prof. Dr. Frank Gohlke - Grammont Design Rationale Poor
Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale	Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale Excellent	Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale Very Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale Good	Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale Fair	Thomas Wright, MD - Hybrid Reverse Rationale Poor
Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning Excellent	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning Very Good	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning Good	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning Fair	Jonathan C. Levy, MD, FAAOS - Computer assisted preoperative planning Poor
Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter?	Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter? Excellent	Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter? Very Good	Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter? Good	Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter? Fair	Derek Cuff, MD - Does the diagnosis matter? Poor
Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post Excellent	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post Very Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post Fair	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Debate: Baseplate design- Screw in/Threaded post Poor
Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit Excellent	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit Very Good	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit Good	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit Fair	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Baseplate design- Pressfit Poor
Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching	Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching Excellent	Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching Very Good	Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching Good	Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching Fair	Andrew Green, MD - Avoiding notching Poor
Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss Excellent	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss Very Good	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss Good	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss Fair	Joseph Iannotti, MD, PhD - Primary Reverse with glenoid bone loss Poor
John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss	John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss Excellent	John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss Very Good	John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss Good	John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss Fair	John W. Sperling, MD - Revision reverse with glenoid bone loss Poor
Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss Excellent	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss Very Good	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss Good	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss Fair	Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Reverse with humeral bone loss Poor
Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble Excellent	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble Very Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble Fair	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD - Revision to reverse- pearls for staying out of trouble Poor
John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what	John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what Excellent	John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what Very Good	John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what Good	John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what Fair	John W. Sperling, MD - Unstable reverse- now what Poor
Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what	Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what Excellent	Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what Very Good	Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what Good	Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what Fair	Lynn Crosby, MD - Periprosthetic fracture- now what Poor
Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations	Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations Excellent	Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations Very Good	Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations Good	Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations Fair	Grant Garrigues, MD - Complex Reverse Case Presentations Poor
Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations Excellent	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations Very Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations Good	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations Fair	Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD Lynn Crosby, MD John W. Sperling, MD - Panel Discussion on Complex Reverse Case Presentations Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION VI: Sports Medicine

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How?	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How? Excellent	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How? Very Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How? Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How? Fair	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Ant. Instability: Latarjet When and How? Poor
Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx Excellent	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx Very Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx Good	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx Fair	Samer Hasan, MD, PhD - Posterior Shoulder Instability and Scope Rx Poor
E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay!	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay! Excellent	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay! Very Good	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay! Good	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay! Fair	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Remplissage is Here to Stay! Poor
Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best!	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best! Excellent	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best! Very Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best! Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best! Fair	Joseph A. Abboud, MD - Debate: Bankart: Open Still Best! Poor
Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care Excellent	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care Very Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care Fair	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Debate: Wake Up! Scope is Standard of Care Poor
John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy	John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy Excellent	John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy Very Good	John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy Good	John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy Fair	John D. Kelly, MD - Tommy John Surgery Made Easy Poor
Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls Excellent	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls Very Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls Fair	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - AC joint reconstruction: indications and pearls Poor
Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion Excellent	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion Very Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion Good	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion Fair	Joseph A. Abboud, MD Samer Hasan, MD, PhD E. Rhett Hobgood, MD Mark Mighell, MD - Sports Medicine Panel Discussion Poor
Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now????	Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now???? Excellent	Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now???? Very Good	Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now???? Good	Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now???? Fair	Derek Cuff, MD - Rotator Cuff Fixation and Rehab: Where are we now???? Poor
Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears Excellent	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears Very Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears Fair	Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Arthroscopic Treatment Subscap tears Poor
John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears	John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears Excellent	John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears Very Good	John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears Good	John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears Fair	John D. Kelly, MD - Rational Approach to Massive Cuff Tears Poor
Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata?	Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata? Excellent	Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata? Very Good	Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata? Good	Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata? Fair	Josh Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Recon: Why aren’t we as good as Mihata? Poor
E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD Excellent	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD Very Good	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD Good	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD Fair	E. Rhett Hobgood, MD - Surface Replacement for Active Patients c GH DJD Poor
Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion	Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion Excellent	Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion Very Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion Good	Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion Fair	Jeffrey Abrams, MD Derek Cuff, MD Josh Dines, MD - Special Presentation: Why Monkeys Can't Throw- The Evolution of Man's Ability to Throw Panel Discussion Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION VII: Upper Extremity Trauma: Fix or Replace

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate	Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate Excellent	Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate Very Good	Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate Good	Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate Fair	Mark Mighell, MD - DJO - FX Plate Poor
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker Excellent	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker Very Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker Good	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker Fair	Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - Stryker Poor
Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology	Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology Excellent	Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology Very Good	Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology Good	Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology Fair	Mark Mighell, MD - Wright Medical featuring Tornier technology Poor
Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne	Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne Excellent	Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne Very Good	Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne Good	Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne Fair	Christopher Baker, MD - Biowick Demo - Zimmer Biomet/Cayenne Poor
Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex	Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex Excellent	Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex Very Good	Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex Good	Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex Fair	Eddie Echols, MD - SCR Demo - Arthrex Poor
Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs	Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs Excellent	Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs Very Good	Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs Good	Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs Fair	Michael McKee, MD - ORIF locked plates current state of affairs Poor
Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture Excellent	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture Very Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture Good	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture Fair	Grant E. Garrigues, MD - Is there value in reverse for fracture Poor
Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures	Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures Excellent	Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures Very Good	Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures Good	Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures Fair	Greg Michael Osgood, MD - Technical tips for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures Poor
T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture	T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture Excellent	T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture Very Good	T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture Good	T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture Fair	T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Pearls of Arthroplasty for Fracture Poor

Question Title

* 15. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 16. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 17. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 18. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 19. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 20. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 20 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

CME Hours should be allocated as follows:
Cadaver Lab: 4.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Elbow Session: 3.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Shoulder Session: 7 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Sports Session: 2.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Fracture Session: 2.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™

Please attest below to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 20) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakersSESSION III: Elbow Session,

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakersSESSION IV: Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakersSESSION V: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakersSESSION VI: Sports Medicine

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakersSESSION VII: Upper Extremity Trauma: Fix or Replace

Question Title

* 15. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 16. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 17. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 18. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 19. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION III: Elbow Session,

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION IV: Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION V: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION VI: Sports Medicine

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION VII: Upper Extremity Trauma: Fix or Replace