American Auditory Society - 2025 Meeting Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Name:

Question Title

* 2. Are you an AAS member?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate if you are a:

Student or Postdoctoral Fellow

New Investigator (<8 years from doctoral degree)

None of the above

Question Title

* 4. Are you or have you been involved in research?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 5. Which professional area most accurately represents your interests?

Audiology

Otolaryngology

Hearing Science

Engineering

Hearing Industry

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate the SCIENTIFIC CONTENT of this conference?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Overall meeting	Overall meeting Outstanding	Overall meeting Excellent	Overall meeting Good	Overall meeting Fair	Overall meeting Poor	Overall meeting N/A
Podium Sessions	Podium Sessions Outstanding	Podium Sessions Excellent	Podium Sessions Good	Podium Sessions Fair	Podium Sessions Poor	Podium Sessions N/A
Poster Sessions	Poster Sessions Outstanding	Poster Sessions Excellent	Poster Sessions Good	Poster Sessions Fair	Poster Sessions Poor	Poster Sessions N/A
Technology Updates	Technology Updates Outstanding	Technology Updates Excellent	Technology Updates Good	Technology Updates Fair	Technology Updates Poor	Technology Updates N/A

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the Quality of the Translational Research Presentations:

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Ross Maddox, PhD	Ross Maddox, PhD Outstanding	Ross Maddox, PhD Excellent	Ross Maddox, PhD Good	Ross Maddox, PhD Fair	Ross Maddox, PhD Poor	Ross Maddox, PhD N/A
Pamela Souza, PhD	Pamela Souza, PhD Outstanding	Pamela Souza, PhD Excellent	Pamela Souza, PhD Good	Pamela Souza, PhD Fair	Pamela Souza, PhD Poor	Pamela Souza, PhD N/A
Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A Outstanding	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A Excellent	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A Good	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A Fair	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A Poor	Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A N/A

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the Quality of the Special Session Presentations:

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A Outstanding	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A Excellent	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A Good	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A Fair	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A Poor	O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A N/A
Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC Outstanding	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC Excellent	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC Good	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC Fair	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC Poor	Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC N/A
Marci M. Lesperance, MD	Marci M. Lesperance, MD Outstanding	Marci M. Lesperance, MD Excellent	Marci M. Lesperance, MD Good	Marci M. Lesperance, MD Fair	Marci M. Lesperance, MD Poor	Marci M. Lesperance, MD N/A
Keiko Hirose, MD	Keiko Hirose, MD Outstanding	Keiko Hirose, MD Excellent	Keiko Hirose, MD Good	Keiko Hirose, MD Fair	Keiko Hirose, MD Poor	Keiko Hirose, MD N/A
Sharon L. Cushing, MD	Sharon L. Cushing, MD Outstanding	Sharon L. Cushing, MD Excellent	Sharon L. Cushing, MD Good	Sharon L. Cushing, MD Fair	Sharon L. Cushing, MD Poor	Sharon L. Cushing, MD N/A
Ryan McCreery, PhD	Ryan McCreery, PhD Outstanding	Ryan McCreery, PhD Excellent	Ryan McCreery, PhD Good	Ryan McCreery, PhD Fair	Ryan McCreery, PhD Poor	Ryan McCreery, PhD N/A

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the SPECIAL FORUMS?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Industry Research Consortium Special Session	Industry Research Consortium Special Session Outstanding	Industry Research Consortium Special Session Excellent	Industry Research Consortium Special Session Good	Industry Research Consortium Special Session Fair	Industry Research Consortium Special Session Poor	Industry Research Consortium Special Session N/A
Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS Outstanding	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS Excellent	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS Good	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS Fair	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS Poor	Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS N/A
Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD Outstanding	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD Excellent	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD Good	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD Fair	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD Poor	Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD N/A
Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees Outstanding	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees Excellent	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees Good	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees Fair	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees Poor	Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees N/A

Question Title

* 10. To what extent do you feel the following sessions contributed to the overall quality of the scientific meeting?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Mentored Student Presentations	Mentored Student Presentations Outstanding	Mentored Student Presentations Excellent	Mentored Student Presentations Good	Mentored Student Presentations Fair	Mentored Student Presentations Poor	Mentored Student Presentations N/A
T35 Student Presentations	T35 Student Presentations Outstanding	T35 Student Presentations Excellent	T35 Student Presentations Good	T35 Student Presentations Fair	T35 Student Presentations Poor	T35 Student Presentations N/A

Question Title

* 11. How would you rate the ORGANIZATION?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Meeting Place	Meeting Place Outstanding	Meeting Place Excellent	Meeting Place Good	Meeting Place Fair	Meeting Place Poor	Meeting Place N/A
Hotel Accommodations	Hotel Accommodations Outstanding	Hotel Accommodations Excellent	Hotel Accommodations Good	Hotel Accommodations Fair	Hotel Accommodations Poor	Hotel Accommodations N/A
Audiovisual Services	Audiovisual Services Outstanding	Audiovisual Services Excellent	Audiovisual Services Good	Audiovisual Services Fair	Audiovisual Services Poor	Audiovisual Services N/A
Registration Process	Registration Process Outstanding	Registration Process Excellent	Registration Process Good	Registration Process Fair	Registration Process Poor	Registration Process N/A

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the OVERALL MEETING CONTENT?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Content consistent with publicity	Content consistent with publicity Outstanding	Content consistent with publicity Excellent	Content consistent with publicity Good	Content consistent with publicity Fair	Content consistent with publicity Poor	Content consistent with publicity N/A
Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting Outstanding	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting Excellent	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting Good	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting Fair	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting Poor	Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting N/A
Activities facilitated learning	Activities facilitated learning Outstanding	Activities facilitated learning Excellent	Activities facilitated learning Good	Activities facilitated learning Fair	Activities facilitated learning Poor	Activities facilitated learning N/A
I would attend this meeting next year	I would attend this meeting next year Outstanding	I would attend this meeting next year Excellent	I would attend this meeting next year Good	I would attend this meeting next year Fair	I would attend this meeting next year Poor	I would attend this meeting next year N/A

Question Title

* 13. How would you rate the IMPLEMENTATION?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Sufficient advance notice of meeting	Sufficient advance notice of meeting Outstanding	Sufficient advance notice of meeting Excellent	Sufficient advance notice of meeting Good	Sufficient advance notice of meeting Fair	Sufficient advance notice of meeting Poor	Sufficient advance notice of meeting N/A
Physical facilities conducive to learning	Physical facilities conducive to learning Outstanding	Physical facilities conducive to learning Excellent	Physical facilities conducive to learning Good	Physical facilities conducive to learning Fair	Physical facilities conducive to learning Poor	Physical facilities conducive to learning N/A
Convenient scheduling (day, time, month)	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) Outstanding	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) Excellent	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) Good	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) Fair	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) Poor	Convenient scheduling (day, time, month) N/A
Sufficient information of meeting content	Sufficient information of meeting content Outstanding	Sufficient information of meeting content Excellent	Sufficient information of meeting content Good	Sufficient information of meeting content Fair	Sufficient information of meeting content Poor	Sufficient information of meeting content N/A
Adequate time for various presentations	Adequate time for various presentations Outstanding	Adequate time for various presentations Excellent	Adequate time for various presentations Good	Adequate time for various presentations Fair	Adequate time for various presentations Poor	Adequate time for various presentations N/A

Question Title

* 14. How would you rate the PRESENTATIONS?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Teaching aids were appropriate	Teaching aids were appropriate Outstanding	Teaching aids were appropriate Excellent	Teaching aids were appropriate Good	Teaching aids were appropriate Fair	Teaching aids were appropriate Poor	Teaching aids were appropriate N/A
Presenters used time efficiently	Presenters used time efficiently Outstanding	Presenters used time efficiently Excellent	Presenters used time efficiently Good	Presenters used time efficiently Fair	Presenters used time efficiently Poor	Presenters used time efficiently N/A
Presenters were prepared & interesting	Presenters were prepared & interesting Outstanding	Presenters were prepared & interesting Excellent	Presenters were prepared & interesting Good	Presenters were prepared & interesting Fair	Presenters were prepared & interesting Poor	Presenters were prepared & interesting N/A
Presenters' styles conducive to learning	Presenters' styles conducive to learning Outstanding	Presenters' styles conducive to learning Excellent	Presenters' styles conducive to learning Good	Presenters' styles conducive to learning Fair	Presenters' styles conducive to learning Poor	Presenters' styles conducive to learning N/A
Information presented was useful	Information presented was useful Outstanding	Information presented was useful Excellent	Information presented was useful Good	Information presented was useful Fair	Information presented was useful Poor	Information presented was useful N/A

Question Title

* 15. How would you rate the SELF-ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING?

	Outstanding	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Interest in hearing related issues increased	Interest in hearing related issues increased Outstanding	Interest in hearing related issues increased Excellent	Interest in hearing related issues increased Good	Interest in hearing related issues increased Fair	Interest in hearing related issues increased Poor	Interest in hearing related issues increased N/A
Acquired new and/or useful information	Acquired new and/or useful information Outstanding	Acquired new and/or useful information Excellent	Acquired new and/or useful information Good	Acquired new and/or useful information Fair	Acquired new and/or useful information Poor	Acquired new and/or useful information N/A
Increased my knowledge and/or skills	Increased my knowledge and/or skills Outstanding	Increased my knowledge and/or skills Excellent	Increased my knowledge and/or skills Good	Increased my knowledge and/or skills Fair	Increased my knowledge and/or skills Poor	Increased my knowledge and/or skills N/A
Will apply knowledge/skills to work	Will apply knowledge/skills to work Outstanding	Will apply knowledge/skills to work Excellent	Will apply knowledge/skills to work Good	Will apply knowledge/skills to work Fair	Will apply knowledge/skills to work Poor	Will apply knowledge/skills to work N/A
Meeting contributed to professional growth	Meeting contributed to professional growth Outstanding	Meeting contributed to professional growth Excellent	Meeting contributed to professional growth Good	Meeting contributed to professional growth Fair	Meeting contributed to professional growth Poor	Meeting contributed to professional growth N/A

Question Title

* 16. How do you intend to use the information gathered from this meeting:

Question Title

* 17. Identify one way that your practice will change or be enhanced as a result of attending this meeting:

Question Title

* 18. Please provide any suggestions you have for format changes or invited speakers for future meetings:

Question Title

* 19. Please provide any suggestions you have for future Carhart Lectures and Lifetime Achievement Awards:

Question Title

* 20. Do you have any other suggestions or comments regarding the AAS annual meeting?