2024 NACNS Student Poster Judging *Elements are "Bolded" Question Title * 1. Judge's Full Name Question Title * 2. Select the Student Poster you are judging: S1 - Standardizing Investigational Hazardous Drug Safe Handling S2 - Imposter Syndrome in the Clinical Nurse Specialist: Impact of Online Educational Intervention S3 - A Standardized Toolkit for Patient Safety Attendants to Reduce Variability in Practice S4 - Putting H.E.A.R.T. Into The Heart Failure Care Pathway S5 - Improving Nursing Compliance with Mandatory Documentation in F10 PACU S6 - Introducing Subcutaneous Diuretic Strategy in the Ambulatory Setting S7 - Evaluation of Pain Management in a Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) S8 - PREPARE: Program Review and Evaluation for Professional Advancement in Nurse Residency Education S9 - A CNS-Led Intervention to Improve Rates of Respiratory Mechanical Device-Related Pressure Injuries in Patients S10 - Improving Patient Outcomes Through Enhanced Interprofessional Communication, Teamwork, and Collaboration During Rapid Response Events S11 - Implementation of a Standardized Apnea Protocol in Premature Infants S12 - Improving Staff Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Through Prolonged Fetal Heart Rate Deceleration Simulation S13 - Getting our HAPIs to Zero: Journey of one Trauma-Surgical ICU S14 - Implementation of a Non-pharmacologic Sleep Bundle to Reduce Delirium S15 - Improving Stroke Care with Depression Screening S16 - Use of visual management to improve pain reassessment by medical/surgical nurses: A quality improvement project S17 - Combating Burnout in Pediatric Emergency Nurses through a Validated Survey and EBP S18 - Achieving Success in Unit Transitions with the Support of a Clinical Nurse Specialist S19 - Multimodal Prevention of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV): Current Recommendations and Implications for Practice S20 - CNS Intern + EBP + Lean Six Sigma = Nurse Driven Telemetry Discontinuation Protocol S21 - Optimizing multidisciplinary rounds: Improving outcomes through collaboration S23 - Move Your Metrics: Lead With Mentorship to Improve Patient Outcomes S24 - Patient/ Family Engagement to Increase Central Venous Catheter Maintenance Bundle Compliance: Pilot Quality Improvement Project S25 - A Clinical Nurse Specialist Led Initiative to Improve the Inpatient STEMI Activation Process. S26 - Evaluation of Developmental Care in a Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) S27 - Empowering nurses through education for appropriate use of a nurse-driven central line removal protocol S28 - Evaluating Nurse and Patient Perceptions of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring Protocol Implementation at Stanford Hospital. S29 - The Evolution of "Power-Week" During New Critical Care Nurse's Orientation S30 - Oral Care for Pneumonia Prevention in Ventilated Patients: a CNS Student Translating Evidence into Practice S31 - Ring-fencing in Elective Surgery: An Evidence-Based DNP Project S32 - CNS Impact as a Sepsis Coordinator S33 - Strengthening the Impact of the DNP Project S34 - Diabetes Self-Management Using Health Coaching in a Care Management Program S35 - Extending the Reach of the CNS To Meet the Needs of the Underserved S36 - Addressing Health Literacy within a Large Urban Medical Academic Center S37 - Incremental Implementation of the ICU Liberation Bundle: A Delirium Assessment Initiative S38 - Addressing Delirium Using NuDESC and a Nurse Driven Practice Bundle S39 - Improving Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice of Ostomy Care to Prevent Complications and Reduce Readmissions Question Title * 3. Title: Should be clear, concise, reflect the content and draw interest of attendees 1 = Very Poor (Title does not reflect the theme/topic) 2 = Needs Improvement (Difficult to discern the project theme/topic) 3 = Acceptable/Average (Title is lengthy, missing key words to describe theme/topic) 4 = Very Good (Title accurately reflects the theme/topic) Question Title * 4. Visual Appeal: Adequate whitespace, easy to follow format, font is easy to read (large enough, appropriate font choice), visuals have significance and are appropriate to the content. Poster is self-explanatory. 1 = Very Poor (3 or all elements are missing) 2 = Needs Improvement (2 elements are missing) 3 = Acceptable/Average (1 element is missing) 4 = Very Good (all elements are present) Question Title * 5. Background and significance to advance nursing practice: Problem is clearly identified. Significance to the CNS role and clinical practice is clear. 1 = Very Poor (all elements are missing) 2 = Needs Improvement (2 elements are missing) 3 = Acceptable/Average (1 element is missing) 4 = Very Good (all elements are present) Question Title * 6. Purpose/Objective: Adequately describes the purpose/intent of the project. 0 = No (gets 0 points) 1 = Yes (gets 1 point) Question Title * 7. Evaluation/Outcome: outcomes are clearly demonstrated with metrics that include post-data collection, project limitations. If applicable, cost savings metrics are included if applicable. 1 = Very Poor (all elements are missing) 2 = Needs Improvement (missing 2 elements) 3 = Acceptable/Average (missing 1 element) 4 = Very Good (cost savings/return on investment) Question Title * 8. Discussion/Implications: lessons learned from the project are adequately defined, implications to advance nursing practice, clinical practice, and/or future research are addressed. 1 = Very Poor (missing all elements) 2 = Needs Improvement/Poor (missing 2 elements) 3 = Acceptable/Average (missing 1 element) 4 = Very Good (all elements are present) Question Title * 9. Level of Impact 1 Unit Multiple Units Hospital Multiple Hospitals Question Title * 10. Overall Comments Done