Appellate 2021 Seminar Evaluation

The purpose of this questionnaire is to help CACJ plan future seminars that satisfy your interests and needs.

Question Title

* How did you watch the Sessions?

Question Title

*
General Seminar

On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the following aspects of today's program.

	1	2	3	4	5
To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice?	To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice? 1	To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice? 2	To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice? 3	To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice? 4	To what extent was today's program relevant and applicable to your practice? 5
To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied?	To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied? 1	To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied? 2	To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied? 3	To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied? 4	To what extent were your personal objectives satisfied? 5
How would you judge today's program as a whole?	How would you judge today's program as a whole? 1	How would you judge today's program as a whole? 2	How would you judge today's program as a whole? 3	How would you judge today's program as a whole? 4	How would you judge today's program as a whole? 5
To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience?	To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience? 1	To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience? 2	To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience? 3	To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience? 4	To what extent did the facilities contribute to the learning experience? 5
To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience?	To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience? 1	To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience? 2	To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience? 3	To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience? 4	To what extent did the syllabus contribute to the learning experience? 5
To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure?	To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure? 1	To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure? 2	To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure? 3	To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure? 4	To what extent did the program meet the objectives suggested by the brochure? 5
To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content?	To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content? 1	To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content? 2	To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content? 3	To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content? 4	To what extent did the program contain significant intellectual or practical content? 5

Question Title

* I found today's seminar:

Worthwhile

Somewhat worthwhile

Not worthwhile

Worthwhile

Somewhat worthwhile

Not worthwhile

Question Title

* In comparison to other seminars, this one was:

Better than most

Average

Less useful than most

Better than most

Average

Less useful than most

Question Title

* Please answer the following:

The best aspects of the seminar were:

The worst aspects of the seminar were:

What topics would you like to see covered at future seminars?

What speakers would you like to hear at future seminars?

Comments about the location, accommodations, registration, scheduling of programs, etc.:

Question Title

*
Speakers/Trainers

On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the speakers from today’s program.

	1	2	3	4	5
Al Menaster: Case Law Update	Al Menaster: Case Law Update 1	Al Menaster: Case Law Update 2	Al Menaster: Case Law Update 3	Al Menaster: Case Law Update 4	Al Menaster: Case Law Update 5
Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel	Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel 1	Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel 2	Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel 3	Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel 4	Pat Ford: IAC - Working with Trial Counsel 5
Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update	Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update 1	Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update 2	Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update 3	Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update 4	Rebecca Jones & Jennifer Hansen: SB 1437 Update 5
Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal	Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal 1	Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal 2	Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal 3	Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal 4	Jane Brown, Lauren Dodge, Deborah Rodriguez, and Rebecca Young: The California Racial Justice Act: Understanding and Leveraging this Groundbreaking Legislative Reform on Appeal 5
Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review	Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review 1	Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review 2	Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review 3	Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review 4	Chuck Sevilla & George Schraer: Tips On How To Righteously Prepare and Write a Petition for Review 5
John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors	John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors 1	John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors 2	John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors 3	John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors 4	John Ellis: Geofence Warrants Make Bad Fourth Amendment Neighbors 5
Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues	Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues 1	Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues 2	Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues 3	Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues 4	Sara Ross: Prosecutorial Misconduct Issues 5

Appellate 2021 Seminar Evaluation

Question Title

* How did you watch the Sessions?

Question Title

* General Seminar On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the following aspects of today's program.

Question Title

* I found today's seminar:

Question Title

* In comparison to other seminars, this one was:

Question Title

* Please answer the following:

Question Title

* Speakers/Trainers On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the speakers from today’s program.

Question Title

* Please share any other comments about the speakers you have below:

*
General Seminar

On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the following aspects of today's program.

*
Speakers/Trainers

On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = excellent or best), please rate the speakers from today’s program.