202-02 Peer Review Spring NMC 2019

Question Title

* 1. Please include your information below to receive credit for this task. The person you review will be able to read your comments but your name and contact information will remain anonymous.
You will receive 2 points for each review you complete. Additional 8 points available for critical comments to help students improve written and presentation work in the future
Total possible 20.

Name:

School:

ID:

Course:

Section:

State:

ZIP:

Country:

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate below which student you are evaluating.
Listed by First and Last name.

Aaron P.

Annalei S.

David R.

Gerald D.

Jan M.

Jeffrey D.

Jerric C.

John M.

Johnson A.

Marijean F.

Mele'Ani C.

Melvin S.

Ruth P.

Sherylyn C.

Uchelbil O.

If you are rating a student not listed above please write out their information below:

Question Title

* 3. The following section is a rating of the individual's presentation.
Presentation Planning Visuals, Questions, For Assessment

	Weak	Adequate	Good	Excellent	N/A
 Sources acknowledged	 Sources acknowledged Weak	 Sources acknowledged Adequate	 Sources acknowledged Good	 Sources acknowledged Excellent	 Sources acknowledged N/A
Other (please specify)
 Support- not -replace points	 Support- not -replace points Weak	 Support- not -replace points Adequate	 Support- not -replace points Good	 Support- not -replace points Excellent	 Support- not -replace points N/A
Other (please specify)
 Accurate –spellings etc	 Accurate –spellings etc Weak	 Accurate –spellings etc Adequate	 Accurate –spellings etc Good	 Accurate –spellings etc Excellent	 Accurate –spellings etc N/A
Other (please specify)
 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points	 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points Weak	 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points Adequate	 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points Good	 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points Excellent	 Use of Tables, Charts, Illustrations to help explain points N/A
Other (please specify)
 Questions Invited	 Questions Invited Weak	 Questions Invited Adequate	 Questions Invited Good	 Questions Invited Excellent	 Questions Invited N/A
Other (please specify)
 Questions responded to appropriately	 Questions responded to appropriately Weak	 Questions responded to appropriately Adequate	 Questions responded to appropriately Good	 Questions responded to appropriately Excellent	 Questions responded to appropriately N/A
Other (please specify)
 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website	 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website Weak	 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website Adequate	 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website Good	 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website Excellent	 Suitability of presentation to be recorded electronically and used in course website N/A
Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. HOW DO YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATION?

	Poor	Adequate	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent	N/A
VISUALS	VISUALS Poor	VISUALS Adequate	VISUALS Satisfactory	VISUALS Good	VISUALS Excellent	VISUALS N/A
RESEARCH	RESEARCH Poor	RESEARCH Adequate	RESEARCH Satisfactory	RESEARCH Good	RESEARCH Excellent	RESEARCH N/A
PRESENTATION PREPARATION	PRESENTATION PREPARATION Poor	PRESENTATION PREPARATION Adequate	PRESENTATION PREPARATION Satisfactory	PRESENTATION PREPARATION Good	PRESENTATION PREPARATION Excellent	PRESENTATION PREPARATION N/A
PRESENTATION TIMING	PRESENTATION TIMING Poor	PRESENTATION TIMING Adequate	PRESENTATION TIMING Satisfactory	PRESENTATION TIMING Good	PRESENTATION TIMING Excellent	PRESENTATION TIMING N/A
QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED Poor	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED Adequate	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED Satisfactory	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED Good	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED Excellent	QUALITY Of INFORMATION PRESENTED N/A
NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION Poor	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION Adequate	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION Satisfactory	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION Good	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION Excellent	NEW INFORMATION YOU LEARNED FROM THE PRESENTATION N/A
AUDIENCE INTERACTION	AUDIENCE INTERACTION Poor	AUDIENCE INTERACTION Adequate	AUDIENCE INTERACTION Satisfactory	AUDIENCE INTERACTION Good	AUDIENCE INTERACTION Excellent	AUDIENCE INTERACTION N/A
CREATIVITY	CREATIVITY Poor	CREATIVITY Adequate	CREATIVITY Satisfactory	CREATIVITY Good	CREATIVITY Excellent	CREATIVITY N/A
CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED Poor	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED Adequate	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED Satisfactory	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED Good	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED Excellent	CRITICAL THINKING EVIDENCED N/A
LOGIC USED	LOGIC USED Poor	LOGIC USED Adequate	LOGIC USED Satisfactory	LOGIC USED Good	LOGIC USED Excellent	LOGIC USED N/A
COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED Poor	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED Adequate	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED Satisfactory	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED Good	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED Excellent	COMPLETION OF ALL STEPS IN PRESENTATION TASK ASSIGNED N/A

What Areas Could be Improved? How?

Question Title

* 5. CONTENT Rate the participants content based on the choices below

	Weak	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent	N/A
 Relevant to topic and appropriate level	 Relevant to topic and appropriate level Weak	 Relevant to topic and appropriate level Satisfactory	 Relevant to topic and appropriate level Good	 Relevant to topic and appropriate level Excellent	 Relevant to topic and appropriate level N/A
 Use of supporting details and examples	 Use of supporting details and examples Weak	 Use of supporting details and examples Satisfactory	 Use of supporting details and examples Good	 Use of supporting details and examples Excellent	 Use of supporting details and examples N/A
 Refers to input readings	 Refers to input readings Weak	 Refers to input readings Satisfactory	 Refers to input readings Good	 Refers to input readings Excellent	 Refers to input readings N/A
 Follows an outline	 Follows an outline Weak	 Follows an outline Satisfactory	 Follows an outline Good	 Follows an outline Excellent	 Follows an outline N/A
 Evidence of independent research	 Evidence of independent research Weak	 Evidence of independent research Satisfactory	 Evidence of independent research Good	 Evidence of independent research Excellent	 Evidence of independent research N/A
 Accuracy APA in-text citations	 Accuracy APA in-text citations Weak	 Accuracy APA in-text citations Satisfactory	 Accuracy APA in-text citations Good	 Accuracy APA in-text citations Excellent	 Accuracy APA in-text citations N/A
 Accuracy APA bibliography	 Accuracy APA bibliography Weak	 Accuracy APA bibliography Satisfactory	 Accuracy APA bibliography Good	 Accuracy APA bibliography Excellent	 Accuracy APA bibliography N/A
 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT	 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT Weak	 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT Satisfactory	 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT Good	 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT Excellent	 COMPLETION OF PAPER ASSIGNMENT N/A
 Research Approach Appears Well Design	 Research Approach Appears Well Design Weak	 Research Approach Appears Well Design Satisfactory	 Research Approach Appears Well Design Good	 Research Approach Appears Well Design Excellent	 Research Approach Appears Well Design N/A
 Analysis was Rigorous	 Analysis was Rigorous Weak	 Analysis was Rigorous Satisfactory	 Analysis was Rigorous Good	 Analysis was Rigorous Excellent	 Analysis was Rigorous N/A
 How much confidence do you have in the findings described	 How much confidence do you have in the findings described Weak	 How much confidence do you have in the findings described Satisfactory	 How much confidence do you have in the findings described Good	 How much confidence do you have in the findings described Excellent	 How much confidence do you have in the findings described N/A

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. ORGANIZATION OF PRESENTATION

	Excellent	Adequate	Satisfactory	Weak
 Clear introduction	 Clear introduction Excellent	 Clear introduction Adequate	 Clear introduction Satisfactory	 Clear introduction Weak
 Well structured	 Well structured Excellent	 Well structured Adequate	 Well structured Satisfactory	 Well structured Weak
 Transition of topics	 Transition of topics Excellent	 Transition of topics Adequate	 Transition of topics Satisfactory	 Transition of topics Weak
 Clear conclusion	 Clear conclusion Excellent	 Clear conclusion Adequate	 Clear conclusion Satisfactory	 Clear conclusion Weak

What Areas Could be Improved? How?

Question Title

* 7. LANGUAGE USE

	Weak	Satisfactory	Adequate	Excellent
 Accurate use of structure	 Accurate use of structure Weak	 Accurate use of structure Satisfactory	 Accurate use of structure Adequate	 Accurate use of structure Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Appropriate style	 Appropriate style Weak	 Appropriate style Satisfactory	 Appropriate style Adequate	 Appropriate style Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Academic and thematic vocabulary	 Academic and thematic vocabulary Weak	 Academic and thematic vocabulary Satisfactory	 Academic and thematic vocabulary Adequate	 Academic and thematic vocabulary Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Formatting of source titles	 Formatting of source titles Weak	 Formatting of source titles Satisfactory	 Formatting of source titles Adequate	 Formatting of source titles Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Presenter seemed comfortable using Academic Terms Presented in Course	 Presenter seemed comfortable using Academic Terms Presented in Course Weak	 Presenter seemed comfortable using Academic Terms Presented in Course Satisfactory	 Presenter seemed comfortable using Academic Terms Presented in Course Adequate	 Presenter seemed comfortable using Academic Terms Presented in Course Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Presenter was able to use specialized terms related to His/Her Topic	 Presenter was able to use specialized terms related to His/Her Topic Weak	 Presenter was able to use specialized terms related to His/Her Topic Satisfactory	 Presenter was able to use specialized terms related to His/Her Topic Adequate	 Presenter was able to use specialized terms related to His/Her Topic Excellent
Other (please specify)
 Presenter used Language Appropriate to the Audience	 Presenter used Language Appropriate to the Audience Weak	 Presenter used Language Appropriate to the Audience Satisfactory	 Presenter used Language Appropriate to the Audience Adequate	 Presenter used Language Appropriate to the Audience Excellent
Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the participants website?


Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available	Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available	Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available	Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available	Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available	Easy to access and all the required documentation (accept perhaps the final presentation if videoed) is available
Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable	Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable	Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable	Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable	Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable	Easy to access but some of the required documentation is unavailable
Unable to access the website is not complete	Unable to access the website is not complete	Unable to access the website is not complete	Unable to access the website is not complete	Unable to access the website is not complete	Unable to access the website is not complete

Question Title

* 9. Eportfolio- How complete and communicative do you find the participants' research report and additional materials to be? Please rate from 1 Excellent - 4 Incomplete, or 5 if unavailable.

Excellent (Thourough includes all the required sections, is written in the correct format and language and is easy to read)

Good ( Includes all the required sections but could use some additional proofing)

Satisfactory (May be missing 1 section, may contain a few errors but generally communicates all the requirements of the course)

Incomplete ( Does not include all the required sections and/or has not been proofed for language and continuity)

Unavailable cannot be assessed

Please provide a general comment on you assessment of the ov-erall eportfolio - what did you like about it and what could be improved?

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the overall project: Research Report, Website and Presentations?

Excellent- Interesting topic and the participant used academic writing and research to investigate and explain his/her results

Good- Interesting paper and presentation - It is clear that the participant was enthusastic and has developed their academic writing and research skills throughout the course as well as learning and sharing information about the topic they chose with others.

Satisfactory- Interesting paper and presentation however the paper or research or presentation needed more development

Weak- Interesting topic it is clear that the participant put work into the paper and research but the participant was not able to complete all the elements of the project as assigned.

Incomplete- Interesting topic but the participant was unable to complete significant sections of the project

Unavailable

Question Title

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate below which student you are evaluating. Listed by First and Last name.

Question Title

* 3. The following section is a rating of the individual's presentation.Presentation Planning Visuals, Questions, For Assessment

Question Title

* 4. HOW DO YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATION?

Question Title

* 5. CONTENT Rate the participants content based on the choices below

Question Title

* 6. ORGANIZATION OF PRESENTATION

Question Title

* 7. LANGUAGE USE

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the participants website?

Question Title

* 9. Eportfolio- How complete and communicative do you find the participants' research report and additional materials to be? Please rate from 1 Excellent - 4 Incomplete, or 5 if unavailable.

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the overall project: Research Report, Website and Presentations?

* 2. Please indicate below which student you are evaluating.
Listed by First and Last name.

* 3. The following section is a rating of the individual's presentation.
Presentation Planning Visuals, Questions, For Assessment