Daily Faculty Evaluation

Saturday, July 13, 2024

Pain Management & Addiction Medicine

Napa, California

Napa Valley Marriott Hotel & Spa

July 11-13, 2024

Please rate each category.

Question Title

* Degree

Question Title

* Specialty

Question Title

* Beyond Sublingual Buprenorphine: Evolving Approaches to the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder | Erik S. Anderson, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Content of lecture	Content of lecture Excellent	Content of lecture Good	Content of lecture Fair	Content of lecture Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant	Lecture was clinically relevant Excellent	Lecture was clinically relevant Good	Lecture was clinically relevant Fair	Lecture was clinically relevant Poor
Delivery of lecture	Delivery of lecture Excellent	Delivery of lecture Good	Delivery of lecture Fair	Delivery of lecture Poor
Session materials	Session materials Excellent	Session materials Good	Session materials Fair	Session materials Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives	Speaker met their stated objectives Excellent	Speaker met their stated objectives Good	Speaker met their stated objectives Fair	Speaker met their stated objectives Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Excellent	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Good	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Fair	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Poor

Question Title

* Specific comments:

Question Title

* Pain Management Through the Eyes of a Toxicologist: Complications, Interactions, and Effects | Robert S. Hoffman, MD, FAACT, FRCP Edin, FEAPCCT

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Content of lecture	Content of lecture Excellent	Content of lecture Good	Content of lecture Fair	Content of lecture Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant	Lecture was clinically relevant Excellent	Lecture was clinically relevant Good	Lecture was clinically relevant Fair	Lecture was clinically relevant Poor
Delivery of lecture	Delivery of lecture Excellent	Delivery of lecture Good	Delivery of lecture Fair	Delivery of lecture Poor
Session materials	Session materials Excellent	Session materials Good	Session materials Fair	Session materials Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives	Speaker met their stated objectives Excellent	Speaker met their stated objectives Good	Speaker met their stated objectives Fair	Speaker met their stated objectives Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Excellent	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Good	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Fair	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Poor

Question Title

* Specific comments:

Question Title

* Challenging Cases in Pain Management & Addiction | Erik S. Anderson, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Content of lecture	Content of lecture Excellent	Content of lecture Good	Content of lecture Fair	Content of lecture Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant	Lecture was clinically relevant Excellent	Lecture was clinically relevant Good	Lecture was clinically relevant Fair	Lecture was clinically relevant Poor
Delivery of lecture	Delivery of lecture Excellent	Delivery of lecture Good	Delivery of lecture Fair	Delivery of lecture Poor
Session materials	Session materials Excellent	Session materials Good	Session materials Fair	Session materials Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives	Speaker met their stated objectives Excellent	Speaker met their stated objectives Good	Speaker met their stated objectives Fair	Speaker met their stated objectives Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Excellent	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Good	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Fair	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Poor

Question Title

* Specific comments:

Question Title

* Distal Acupuncture Treatments for Pain Management | Christina Martin, L.AC., FABORM, CPCC

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Content of lecture	Content of lecture Excellent	Content of lecture Good	Content of lecture Fair	Content of lecture Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant	Lecture was clinically relevant Excellent	Lecture was clinically relevant Good	Lecture was clinically relevant Fair	Lecture was clinically relevant Poor
Delivery of lecture	Delivery of lecture Excellent	Delivery of lecture Good	Delivery of lecture Fair	Delivery of lecture Poor
Session materials	Session materials Excellent	Session materials Good	Session materials Fair	Session materials Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives	Speaker met their stated objectives Excellent	Speaker met their stated objectives Good	Speaker met their stated objectives Fair	Speaker met their stated objectives Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Excellent	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Good	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Fair	Audio/visual (slides, etc.) Poor

Question Title

* Specific comments: