ICS Masterclass Evaluation Survey

Thank you for taking the time to review an ICS Masterclass

This short evaluation form should only take 5-10mins to complete.

Anonymized responses will be provided to the ICS Education Committee and the Masterclass Chairs following the event.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neither agree nor disagree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The speakers were engaging and experts in the field	The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Strongly Agree	The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Agree	The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Neither agree nor disagree	The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Disagree	The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Strongly Disagree
The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions	The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Strongly Agree	The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Agree	The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Neither agree nor disagree	The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Disagree	The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Strongly Disagree
The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings	The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Strongly Agree	The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Agree	The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Neither agree nor disagree	The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Disagree	The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Strongly Disagree
The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session	The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Strongly Agree	The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Agree	The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Neither agree nor disagree	The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Disagree	The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Strongly Disagree
This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Strongly Agree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Agree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Neither agree nor disagree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Disagree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Strongly Disagree
This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Strongly Agree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Agree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Neither agree nor disagree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Disagree	This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Strongly Agree

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Agree

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Neither agree nor disagree

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Disagree

The speakers were engaging and experts in the field Strongly Disagree

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Strongly Agree

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Agree

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Neither agree nor disagree

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Disagree

The length and pace of the Masterclass was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions Strongly Disagree

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Strongly Agree

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Agree

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Neither agree nor disagree

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Disagree

The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings Strongly Disagree

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Strongly Agree

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Agree

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Neither agree nor disagree

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Disagree

The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session Strongly Disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Strongly Agree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Agree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Neither agree nor disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-disciplinary Strongly Disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Strongly Agree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Agree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Neither agree nor disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Disagree

This Masterclass was appropriately multi-national Strongly Disagree

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Originality	Originality Excellent	Originality Good	Originality Fair	Originality Poor
Relevance	Relevance Excellent	Relevance Good	Relevance Fair	Relevance Poor
Innovation	Innovation Excellent	Innovation Good	Innovation Fair	Innovation Poor

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Originality

Originality Excellent

Originality Good

Originality Fair

Originality Poor

Relevance

Relevance Excellent

Relevance Good

Relevance Fair

Relevance Poor

Innovation

Innovation Excellent

Innovation Good

Innovation Fair

Innovation Poor

ICS Masterclass Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Please enter the title of the Masterclass you are reviewing

Question Title

* 2. What was the date of the Masterclass?

Question Title

* 3. Please note how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the following qualities of the Masterclass?

Question Title

* 5. Were the objectives of this Masterclass met?

Question Title

* 6. What were your main take aways from this Masterclass?

Question Title

* 7. Please note any improvement suggestions for this Masterclass here.

Question Title

* 8. Please note any subjects that you would like to see ICS Masterclasses on in the future here.