2017 Calusa Ambulatory Spine Conference

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Calusa Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Evaluate and discuss treatment options for ambulatory and outpatient spine conditions	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for ambulatory and outpatient spine conditions Significantly Met	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for ambulatory and outpatient spine conditions Somewhat Met	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for ambulatory and outpatient spine conditions Not Met
Assess the current and future trends in emerging technologies	Assess the current and future trends in emerging technologies Significantly Met	Assess the current and future trends in emerging technologies Somewhat Met	Assess the current and future trends in emerging technologies Not Met
Assess the general health care marketplace	Assess the general health care marketplace Significantly Met	Assess the general health care marketplace Somewhat Met	Assess the general health care marketplace Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION I: Ambulatory Options for Lumbar Spondylosis

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Poor
Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis	Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis Excellent	Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis Very Good	Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis Good	Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis Fair	Donald Hales, MD - Evidence-Based Management of Spinal Stenosis Poor
Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization	Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization Excellent	Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization Very Good	Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization Good	Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization Fair	Donald Hales, MD - Interlaminar Decompression Stabilization Poor
Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data	Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data Excellent	Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data Very Good	Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data Good	Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data Fair	Ryan DenHaese, MD - Spinous Process Stabilization vs MIS Pedicle Screw Fixation & Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Prospective Randomized Trial with 2-year Data Poor
James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression	James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Excellent	James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Very Good	James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Good	James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Fair	James Yue, MD - Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Poor
Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies	Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies Excellent	Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies Very Good	Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies Good	Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies Fair	Larry Knoo, MD - Long-term Results of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in 500 Patients: Outcomes, Complications, Limitations, and New Technologies Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION II: Ambulatory Options for Cervical Spondylosis

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Case Presentation Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression	Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Cervical Decompression Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion	Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Anterior Cervical Fusion Poor
James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement	James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement Excellent	James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement Very Good	James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement Good	James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement Fair	James Yue, MD - Total Disc Replacement Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor
Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker	Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker Excellent	Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker Very Good	Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker Good	Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker Fair	Scott Becker - Keynote Speaker Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION III: The State of the Ambulatory Spine Industry

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room?	Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room? Excellent	Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room? Very Good	Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room? Good	Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room? Fair	Jamie Adams - Who is in Dr. Google's Waiting Room? Poor
Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments	Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments Excellent	Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments Very Good	Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments Good	Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments Fair	Stephen H. Hochschuler, MD - The Role of Retrospective and Predictive Analytics in Bundled Payments Poor
Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise	Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise Good	Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Jamie Adams - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION IV: Industry Innovations

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017	Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017 Excellent	Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017 Very Good	Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017 Good	Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017 Fair	Robin Young, - Leading Technologies for 2017 Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Lateral Interbody Fusion Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - MMG for Posterior Decompression Surgery Poor
Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis	Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Excellent	Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Very Good	Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Good	Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Fair	Chip Wade, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - New Areas of Technologies and Mechanotransduction for Metals vs PEEK Poor
Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes	Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes Excellent	Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes Very Good	Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes Good	Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes Fair	Larry Khoo, MD - Techniques to Optimize Sagittal Correction in Single Level Interbody Fusion and Long-Term Outcomes Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor
Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker	Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker Excellent	Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker Very Good	Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker Good	Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker Fair	Ret. Major General Barrye L. Price, PhD - Keynote Speaker Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION V: Advanced Ambulatory Treatment Options

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion	John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Excellent	John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Very Good	John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Good	John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Fair	John Peloza, MD - Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Poor
Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion	Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion Excellent	Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion Very Good	Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion Good	Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion Fair	Robert Blok, Jr, DO - MIS Posterior Cervical Fusion Poor
John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression	John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression Excellent	John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression Very Good	John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression Good	John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression Fair	John Kimball, MD - Toracic Lateral Extraforaminal Decompression Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VI: Biomechanics

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation	Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Interspinous Process Fixation Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Interbody Biomechanics Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VII: Biologics

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes Excellent	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes Very Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes Fair	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Surface Technology Clinical Outcomes Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth	Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - The Science of Interbody Bone Growth Poor
John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies	John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies Excellent	John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies Very Good	John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies Good	John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies Fair	John Peloza, MD - Stem Cell Therapies Poor
Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc	Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc Excellent	Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc Very Good	Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc Good	Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc Fair	Douglas Beall, MD - Stem Cell Augmentation for the Intervertebral Disc Poor
Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion	Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion Excellent	Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion Very Good	Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion Good	Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion Fair	Larry Khoo, MD - The Use of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in the Treatment of Sciatica and for Spinal Fusion Poor
Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine	Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine Excellent	Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine Very Good	Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine Good	Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine Fair	Timothy Ganey, PhD - Biopotential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine Poor
Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells	Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells Excellent	Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells Very Good	Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells Good	Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells Fair	Kevin Foley, MD - Nucleus Pulposus Repair Utilizing Human Disc Progenitor Cells Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor
Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker	Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker Excellent	Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker Very Good	Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker Good	Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker Fair	Michael Steele - Keynote Speaker Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VIII: Potpurri

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs	Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs Excellent	Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs Very Good	Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs Good	Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs Fair	Lynette Bear, CRNA, DNP - Sleep Apnea and the Impact on ASCs Poor
Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD	Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD Excellent	Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD Very Good	Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD Good	Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD Fair	Nelson Hendler, MD - How to Increase Surgeons Revenue by Using Online Medical Assessment Tools from MCD Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION IX: Health Care and Business Law

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery	Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery Excellent	Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery Very Good	Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery Good	Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery Fair	Jamie Adams - Marketing Business Models in Spine Surgery Poor
Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today	Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today Excellent	Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today Very Good	Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today Good	Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today Fair	Christopher Knopik - Legal Issues for ASCs Today Poor
Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape Excellent	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape Very Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape Fair	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Payer Landscpape Poor
Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Excellent	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Very Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Good	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Fair	Michael Weiss, DO - Scholarly Expertise Poor

Question Title

* 19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 22. Please rate thefollowing:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Conference Location	Conference Location Excellent	Conference Location Very Good	Conference Location Good	Conference Location Fair	Conference Location Poor
Length of Conference	Length of Conference Excellent	Length of Conference Very Good	Length of Conference Good	Length of Conference Fair	Length of Conference Poor
Recreational Activites	Recreational Activites Excellent	Recreational Activites Very Good	Recreational Activites Good	Recreational Activites Fair	Recreational Activites Poor

Please explain:

Question Title

* 23. What are your thoughts on extending the conference and beginning Friday afternoon?

Question Title

* 24. Would you be interested in attending this conference again next year?

Yes

Question Title

* 25. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 26. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 27. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with ethe accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) and The Spine Research Foundation. FORE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Credit Designation Statement Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education designates this live activity for a maximum of 16 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest below:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Calusa Spine course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION I: Ambulatory Options for Lumbar Spondylosis

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION II: Ambulatory Options for Cervical Spondylosis

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION III: The State of the Ambulatory Spine Industry

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION IV: Industry Innovations

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION V: Advanced Ambulatory Treatment Options

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION VI: Biomechanics

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION VII: Biologics

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION VIII: Potpurri

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakersSESSION IX: Health Care and Business Law

Question Title

* 19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 22. Please rate thefollowing:

Question Title

* 23. What are your thoughts on extending the conference and beginning Friday afternoon?

Question Title

* 24. Would you be interested in attending this conference again next year?

Question Title

* 25. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 26. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Calusa Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION I: Ambulatory Options for Lumbar Spondylosis

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION II: Ambulatory Options for Cervical Spondylosis

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION III: The State of the Ambulatory Spine Industry

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION IV: Industry Innovations

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION V: Advanced Ambulatory Treatment Options

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VI: Biomechanics

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VII: Biologics

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION VIII: Potpurri

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Calusa Spine Ambulatory Spine Conference speakers
SESSION IX: Health Care and Business Law