2017 Selby Spine

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Selby Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Evaluate and discuss treatment options for complex and challenging deformity cases	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for complex and challenging deformity cases Significantly Met	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for complex and challenging deformity cases Somewhat Met	Evaluate and discuss treatment options for complex and challenging deformity cases Not Met
Assess the current trends in imaging and emerging technologies	Assess the current trends in imaging and emerging technologies Significantly Met	Assess the current trends in imaging and emerging technologies Somewhat Met	Assess the current trends in imaging and emerging technologies Not Met
Compare evidence of cervical spine care options	Compare evidence of cervical spine care options Significantly Met	Compare evidence of cervical spine care options Somewhat Met	Compare evidence of cervical spine care options Not Met
Assess the general healthcare marketplace and legal landscape as it relates to spine surgery.	Assess the general healthcare marketplace and legal landscape as it relates to spine surgery. Significantly Met	Assess the general healthcare marketplace and legal landscape as it relates to spine surgery. Somewhat Met	Assess the general healthcare marketplace and legal landscape as it relates to spine surgery. Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION I: Future of Healthcare

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America	Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America Excellent	Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America Very Good	Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America Good	Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America Fair	Shelly Timmons, MD - Update on ACA Impact on Patient Care in America Poor
Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future	Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future Excellent	Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future Very Good	Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future Good	Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future Fair	Mark D. Jiatt, MD - Current State of the ACA and Possible Insurance Industry Directions in the Neat and Intermediate Future Poor
Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America	Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America Excellent	Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America Very Good	Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America Good	Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America Fair	Congressman Bob Dold - Update on Legislative Direction on Health Care in America Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION II: Updates on Technology in MISS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned?	Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned? Excellent	Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned? Very Good	Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned? Good	Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned? Fair	Andrew Utter, MD - Radiation in Spine Surgery; Should We be Concerned? Poor
Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery	Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery Excellent	Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery Very Good	Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery Good	Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery Fair	Tony Bozzio, MD - Current Trends; An Update on Navigation in Spine Surgery Poor
Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now?	Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now? Excellent	Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now? Very Good	Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now? Good	Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now? Fair	Tony Bozzio, MD - Robotics in Spine Surgery: Where are We Now? Poor
Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update	Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update Excellent	Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update Very Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update Fair	Pierce Nunley, MD - Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: An Evidence-Based Update Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION III: Biologics

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments?	Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments? Excellent	Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments? Very Good	Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments? Good	Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments? Fair	Eric Muehlbauer, MJ, CAE - Are Stem Cells Still the Future of Medicine or are They the Forrest Gump of all Treatments? Poor
Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update	Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update Excellent	Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update Very Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update Fair	Wellington Hsu, MD - Spine Biologics: An Overview and Evidence-Based Update Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help?	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help? Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help? Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help? Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help? Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Intradiscal Therapies: Can They Really Help? Poor
Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing?	Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing? Excellent	Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing? Very Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing? Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing? Fair	Wellington Hsu, MD - What's New in Allograft Processing? Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION IV:Biomaterials

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary?	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary? Excellent	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary? Very Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary? Good	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary? Fair	Adam Bruggeman, MD - Intervertebral Implants: PEEK to Titanium - Was This Necessary? Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface?	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface? Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface? Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface? Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface? Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - What is a Nanosurface? Poor
Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update	Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update Excellent	Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update Very Good	Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update Good	Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update Fair	Barbara Boyan, PhD - Titanium Implants with Nanosurface: An Evidence Based Update Poor
Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK	Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK Excellent	Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK Very Good	Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK Good	Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK Fair	Richard Fessler, MD - Teaching an Old Dof New Tricks: New Methods for Improving the Osseointegration of PEEK Poor
Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride	Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride Excellent	Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride Very Good	Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride Good	Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride Fair	Sonny Bal, MD - New Biomaterials - The Case for Silicon Nitride Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION V: Expandable Cages

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages?	Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages? Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages? Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages? Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages? Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - What's New in Expandable Cages? Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro	Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - Debate: Pro Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Debate: Con Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VI: Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go	Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go Excellent	Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go Very Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go Fair	Wellington Hsu, MD - MISS TLIF is the Way to Go Poor
Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go	Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go Excellent	Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go Very Good	Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go Good	Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go Fair	Rick Sasso, MD - Indirect Decompression is the Way to Go Poor
Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go	Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go Excellent	Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go Very Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go Fair	Pierce Nunley, MD - Interlaminar/Interspinous Implants are the Way to Go Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VII: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature	Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature Excellent	Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature Very Good	Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature Good	Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature Fair	Rick Sasso, MD - An Overview of Complications in MISS: A Review of the Literature Poor
Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo?	Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo? Excellent	Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo? Very Good	Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo? Good	Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo? Fair	Alexander Vacarro, MD - The Learning Curve in MISS: When Should a Surgeon Be Cleared to Fly Solo? Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VII: Debates and Cases

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Pro	Reginald Davis, MD - Pro Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Pro Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Pro Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Pro Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Pro Poor
Thomas Freeman, MD - Con	Thomas Freeman, MD - Con Excellent	Thomas Freeman, MD - Con Very Good	Thomas Freeman, MD - Con Good	Thomas Freeman, MD - Con Fair	Thomas Freeman, MD - Con Poor
Andrew Utter, MD - Pro	Andrew Utter, MD - Pro Excellent	Andrew Utter, MD - Pro Very Good	Andrew Utter, MD - Pro Good	Andrew Utter, MD - Pro Fair	Andrew Utter, MD - Pro Poor
John Small, MD - Con	John Small, MD - Con Excellent	John Small, MD - Con Very Good	John Small, MD - Con Good	John Small, MD - Con Fair	John Small, MD - Con Poor
Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro	Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro Excellent	Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro Very Good	Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro Good	Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro Fair	Alexander Vacarro, MD - Pro Poor
Pierce Nunley, MD - Con	Pierce Nunley, MD - Con Excellent	Pierce Nunley, MD - Con Very Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Con Good	Pierce Nunley, MD - Con Fair	Pierce Nunley, MD - Con Poor
Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best	Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best Excellent	Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best Very Good	Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best Good	Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best Fair	Rick Sasso, MD - Anterior Surgery is Best Poor
Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best	Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best Excellent	Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best Very Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best Good	Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best Fair	Wellington Hsu, MD - Laminoplasty is Best Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best	Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Laminectomy and Fusion is Best Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Pro Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Con Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VIII: Deformity: The Broad Picture

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease	Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - Prevalence at Impact of Spinal Deformity in the Aging Spine: The Burden of Disease Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery	Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Understanding Sagittal Balance, Radiographic Assessment and Goals of Surgery Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery	Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - Value Considerations in Adult Deformity Surgery Poor

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION IX: Thoracolumbar Deformity

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology	John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology Excellent	John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology Very Good	John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology Good	John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology Fair	John Small, MD - The Transition from Degenerative Pathology to Deformity: The Importance of Lumbosacral Lordosis in Degenerative Pathology Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More?	Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More? Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More? Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More? Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More? Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - When Should We Do Less? When Should We do More? Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery	Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - When to Say No to Surgery Poor

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION X: CERVICOTHORACIC DEFORMITY

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity	Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - Radiographic Measures of Cervical Deformity Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope	Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - When to correct a deformity in the Subaxial cervical spine and when to correct deformity in the thoracic or lumbar spine; the importance of T1 slope Poor
John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine	John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine Excellent	John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine Very Good	John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine Good	John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine Fair	John Small, MD - Posterior osteotomies in the cervicothoracic spine Poor

Question Title

* 21. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION XI: Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Prevalence and impact of complications in complex spine surgery Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions	Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Proximal Junction failure; Causes and solutions Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions	Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - Reoperations in spine surgery; causes and solutions Poor

Question Title

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION XII: Case Presentation

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy	Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy Excellent	Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy Very Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy Good	Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy Fair	Sigurd Berven, MD - 72-year-old female with lumbar degenerative deformity, lumbosacral pain with L5 radiculopathy Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1	Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1 Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1 Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1 Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1 Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Limited Fusion at L4-S1 Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1	Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1 Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1 Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1 Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1 Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Fusion from T10 to S1 Poor

Question Title

* 23. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 24. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 25. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 26. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 27. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 28. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 11 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)^TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 11) that you spent in this CME
activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Selby Spine course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION I: Future of Healthcare

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION II: Updates on Technology in MISS

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION III: Biologics

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION IV:Biomaterials

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION V: Expandable Cages

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION VI: Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION VII: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION VII: Debates and Cases

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION VIII: Deformity: The Broad Picture

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION IX: Thoracolumbar Deformity

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION X: CERVICOTHORACIC DEFORMITY

Question Title

* 21. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION XI: Complications

Question Title

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakersSESSION XII: Case Presentation

Question Title

* 23. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 24. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 25. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 26. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 27. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Selby Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION I: Future of Healthcare

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION II: Updates on Technology in MISS

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION III: Biologics

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION IV:Biomaterials

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION V: Expandable Cages

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VI: Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VII: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VII: Debates and Cases

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION VIII: Deformity: The Broad Picture

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION IX: Thoracolumbar Deformity

* 20. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION X: CERVICOTHORACIC DEFORMITY

* 21. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION XI: Complications

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION XII: Case Presentation