2016 Castellvi Spine

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Significantly Met	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Somewhat Met	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Not Met
Discuss adult deformity and complications	Discuss adult deformity and complications Significantly Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Somewhat Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Not Met
Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Significantly Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Somewhat Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Not Met
Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Significantly Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Somewhat Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Not Met
Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Significantly Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Somewhat Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: LUMBAR

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator?	Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? Excellent	Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? Very Good	Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? Good	Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? Fair	Domagoj Coric, MD - Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? Poor
Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion	Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point Good	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point Fair	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Point Poor
Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point	Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point Excellent	Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point Very Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point Fair	Hyun Bae, MD - Stem Cell Point Poor
Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device	Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device Excellent	Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device Very Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device Fair	Hyun Bae, MD - Interspinous Dynamic Device Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point	Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Conservative Point Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Poor
Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)	Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Excellent	Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Very Good	Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Good	Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Fair	Terrance Julien, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Poor
Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies Excellent	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies Very Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies Fair	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - OLIF Revision Strategies Poor
Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Good	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Fair	Scott Webb, DO - Total Disc Replacement Poor
Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion	Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion Excellent	Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion Very Good	Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion Good	Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion Fair	Alex Castellvi, MD - Sacroiliac Fusion Poor
James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery	James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery Excellent	James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery Very Good	James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery Good	James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery Fair	James Billys, MD - MIS Posterior Cervical and Decompression Surgery Poor
Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery	Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery Excellent	Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery Very Good	Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery Good	Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery Fair	Joseph Wasselle, MD - How to Handle Critical Bleeding in Surgery Poor
Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin Excellent	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin Very Good	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin Good	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin Fair	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Deep Vein Thrombosis- Aspirin & Heparin Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD	Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment- IVC Filters SCD Poor
Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	Richard Hynes, MD, FACS - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion	William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	William Welch, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas Excellent	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas Very Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas Fair	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - ALIF Lateral Transpoas Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Endoscopic Decompression Poor
Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization	Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Excellent	Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Very Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Fair	Hyun Bae, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Poor
Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement	Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement Good	Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement Fair	Scott Webb, DO - Facet Replacement Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: CAGE WARS & SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing Excellent	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing Very Good	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing Good	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing Fair	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - Cages and Bone Healing Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages	Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Titanium Coated Cages Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Nano Technologies; In the Clinic Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Nano Technologies; In the Lab Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages	Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Expandable Cages Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters?	Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters? Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters? Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters? Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters? Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Advancements in Implant Surface Technologies to Enhance Fusion: What Really Matters? Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Metal vs Peek Poor
William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins	William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Excellent	William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Very Good	William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Good	William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Fair	William Welch, MD - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Live Stem Cell Bone Allograft Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Stand Alone vs Posterior Screws Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible?	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible? Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible? Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible? Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible? Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation; Is it Possible? Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers Session III: BIOMECHANICS & KINEMATICS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanics Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Vertebral Motion Analysis Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis	Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Evaluation of Fusion CT Scan Versus Vertebral Motion Analysis Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: STEM CELL

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Updates and Outcomes Poor
Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics	Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics Excellent	Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics Very Good	Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics Good	Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics Fair	Daniel Grande, PhD - Advances in Biologics Poor
Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration	Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration Excellent	Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration Very Good	Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration Good	Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration Fair	Domagoj Coric, MD - Current FDA Trials- Disk Regeneration Poor
Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion	Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion Excellent	Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion Very Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion Fair	Hyun Bae, MD - Advances in Biologics for Fusion Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: FUSION; WHAT REALLY WORKS?

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation Excellent	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation Very Good	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation Good	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation Fair	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - State of the Nation Poor
Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion?	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion? Excellent	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion? Very Good	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion? Good	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion? Fair	Celeste Abjornson, PhD - What is Needed for Optimal Fusion? Poor
Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion	Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion Excellent	Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion Very Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion Good	Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion Fair	Hyun Bae, MD - Allograft Fusion Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion	Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Autograft Fusion Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: STATE OF THE NATION

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine Excellent	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine Very Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine Good	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine Fair	Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD, FRCSC - Value vs Spine Poor
John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update	John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update Excellent	John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update Very Good	John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update Good	John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update Fair	John Viscogliosi - Sunshine Act Update Poor
Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You	Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You Excellent	Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You Very Good	Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You Good	Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You Fair	Jeff Dunkel - Spine Surgeons in the Crosshairs: How Data & Registration Allow Payers and Patients to Evaluate You Poor
Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics	Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics Excellent	Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics Very Good	Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics Good	Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics Fair	Sue Sexton - Industry Insights and Analytics Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: SCOLIOSIS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance?	Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance? Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance? Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance? Good	Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance? Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - What is Sagittal Balance? Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning	Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Interop Navigation & Planning Poor
Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important	Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important Excellent	Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important Very Good	Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important Good	Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important Fair	Domagoj Coric, MD vs William Welch, MD - Single Level Balance; Important or Not Important Poor
John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction	John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction Excellent	John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction Very Good	John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction Good	John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction Fair	John Small, MD vs Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Case Presentations PSO vs Anterior Column Reconstruction Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VIII: Navigation

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation	Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation Excellent	Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation Very Good	Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation Good	Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation Fair	Cody Bell - Technical Considerations of Navigation Poor
Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role Excellent	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role Very Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role Fair	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Role Poor
Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation	Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation Excellent	Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation Very Good	Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation Good	Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation Fair	Raphael Roybal, MD - Intraoperative Fluoro Navigation Poor
Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery Excellent	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery Very Good	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery Good	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery Fair	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis and Scoliosis Surgery Poor
Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation	Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation Excellent	Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation Very Good	Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation Good	Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation Fair	Toby Moore, DO - Cement Augmentation Poor
Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression	Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression Excellent	Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression Very Good	Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression Good	Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression Fair	Terrance Julien, MD - Indirect Decompression Poor

Question Title

* 18. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 19. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 20. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 21. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 22. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 23. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 17 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For the purpose of recertification, the following organizations accept AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TMfrom organizations accredited by the ACCME.

American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA)

American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

American Academy of Neurosurgeons (AANS)

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 17) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION I: LUMBAR

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION II: CAGE WARS & SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers Session III: BIOMECHANICS & KINEMATICS

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION IV: STEM CELL

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION IV: FUSION; WHAT REALLY WORKS?

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION VI: STATE OF THE NATION

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakersSESSION VII: SCOLIOSIS

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION VIII: Navigation

Question Title

* 18. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 19. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 20. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 21. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 22. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: LUMBAR

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: CAGE WARS & SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: STEM CELL

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: FUSION; WHAT REALLY WORKS?

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: STATE OF THE NATION

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: SCOLIOSIS

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VIII: Navigation