Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

  Significantly Met Somewhat Met Not Met
Apply innovative methods of assessment and management to various shoulder and elbow disorders 
Apply current concepts to total elbow arthroplasty 
Consider the post-operative complications and outcomes following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Identify humeral and glenoid bone loss and develop strategies to manage as they relate to anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty 
Develop strategies for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears
Access the options for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION I: SPORTS MEDICINE

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Instability Bankart Remplssage- Basics
Richard Hawkins, MD - Open Bankart: Why and How
Anthony Miniaci, MD - Boney Reconstruction Options for Shoulder Instability Repair
Hiroyuki Sugaya, MD - Glenoid Bone Loss: the Truth
Joseph Abboud, MD - Latarjet Made Easy
Hiroyuki Sugaya, MD & Eric Ricchetti, MD - Debate: Boney Bankart: Repair (Sugaya) vs Reconstruc (Ricchetti)
Larry D. Field, MD - Suprascapular Nerve Release: True indications and Tips
John Kelly, MD - Approach to Throwing Shoulder
Larry D. Field, MD - Posterior Instability Rx Made Easy
John Kelly, MD - DJD Scope Debridement, Resurfacing: Does it Work?
Jeffrey Abrams, MD - Cuff Pasta Repair: My way
Anthony Miniaci, MD - Scope Cuff Repair: Keys to the Universe
John Zvijac, MD - Subscap Repair - Open vs Scope?
Hiroyuki Sugaya, MD - Footprint Repair and Factors that Promote Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair
Steven Paul Arnoczky, MD -  Augmentation cuff repair: Balancing biomechanics and biology
Joshua Dines, MD - Superior Capsule Reconstruction: Fact or Fad

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION II: All Things Proximal Humerus

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Which Fractures Require Internal Fixation
Michael D. MCKee, MD - Proximal Humerus Fractures: Where Are We?
Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Value Proposition of Treating Proximal Humerus Fractures
William T. Obremsky, MD - Innovative Plating Techniques for Proximal Humerus Fractures
T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Reverse for Fracture
Thomas Wright, MD - Complications of Internal Fixation: What Now?
Jonathan Levy, MD & Joseph Zuckerman, MD - Debate: Hemi vs Reverse for Fracture
Mark A. Mighell, MD - Case Presentations & Panel Discussion

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION III: Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Joaquin Sotelo Sanchez, MD - Humeral Head Implant- Anatomical Design Concepts
Edwin Spencer vs Brad Edwards - Point counter point-Stem or not
Robert Tashjian, MD - Pre-operative Evaluation of Glenoid Anatomy
Thomas "Quin" Throckmorton, MD - Glenoid Design and Fixation
Eric Ricchetti, MD, Richard Friedman, MD - Point counter point-Subscapularis Management- Peel (Richard Friedman) vs LTO (Eric Ricchetti)
T. Bradley Edwards, MD - Optimizing Glenoid Exposure
Andrew Green, MD - Computer assisted preop planning and intraoperative guidance for glenoid (PSI)
David Duckworth, MD - Use of Stemless Implants for Treatment of Humeral Arthritis
Andrew Green, MD, David Duckworth, MD - Point counter point-Anatomic Arthroplasty in the Young Patient- Ream and Run (Andrew Green) vs Total Shoulder (David Duckworth)
Eric Ricchetti, MD  - B2 Glenoid- Anatomic Reconstruction- Bone or Augment
John Zvijac, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Active Adults using a Novel Inlay Glenoid
Joseph Abboud, MD - Avoiding Complications- Fracture, Instability, Neurologic
Surena Namdari, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Infection
Andrew Green, MD - Quality of Life After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Lawrence Gulotta, MD - Long-Term Outcomes of Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty
Dean Harter to Panel- Lawrence Gulotta, Buzz Burkhead, Ed Spencer - What would you do? Case Presentation

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION IV: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Mark Frankle, MD - Reverse Design Rationale
Thomas Wright, MD, Mark Frankle, MD - Point counter point-Stem Design - inset vs onset
Robert Tashjian, MD - Glenoid design - Medializatin vs lateralization
Howard Routman, MD - Indications and Outcomes
Jeff Abrams, MD & Buzz Burkhead, MD - Point counter point- I can fix it (Jeff Abrams-partial arthroscopic cuff repair) vs no you can’t (Buzz Burkhead-reverse shoulder arthroplasty)
Buzz Burkhead, MD - My experience using Reverse Shoulder Replacement
Richard Hawkins, MD, David Duckworth, MD - Point counter point Subscapularis management- Repair it (David Duckworth) vs Leave it (Richard Hawkins)
Andrew Green, MD - Primary reverse with glenoid bone loss
Edwin Spencer, MD - Revision to reverse with glenoid bone loss
Dean Harter, MD - Reverse with humeral bone deficiency
Richard Friedman, MD - The unstable reverse shoulder arthroplasty- what now?
Quin Throckmorton to panel: Mark Frankle, Brad Edwards, Buzz Burkhead - What would you do? Complex case presentation

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Current Solutions in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery speakers
SESSION V: Elbow Section

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Panel: McKee, Mighells, Orbay, Morrey - Cases presented by Dr. Sanchez-Sotelo
Mark Mighell, MD - Terrible Triad
Joshua Dines, MD - MCL reconstruction
David Duckworth, MD - Biceps Tendon Repair
Mark Morrey, MD - Open contracture release
Jorge Orbay, MD - Managing the unstable elbow utilizing the internal joint stabilizer
Surena Namdari, MD - Radial Head Replacement: Sooth loose fitting
Mark Mighell, MD - Radial Head Replacement: Fixed anatomic
Michael McKee, MD - Ulnar nerve in trauma: Transpose
Jorge Orbay, MD - Ulnar nerve in trauma: In situ
Mark Morrey, MD - End-stage arthritis in the young adult: Interposition
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD - End-stage arthritis in the young adult: Arthroplasty

Question Title

* 15. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 16. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 17. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 18. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 19. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 20. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 20 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For the purpose of recertification, the following organizations accept AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
  • American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA)
  • American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)
Please attest below to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 20) that you spent in this CME activity:

T