2017 Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Evaluate surgical and nonsurgical principles of managing common hand and upper extremity problems	Evaluate surgical and nonsurgical principles of managing common hand and upper extremity problems Significantly Met	Evaluate surgical and nonsurgical principles of managing common hand and upper extremity problems Somewhat Met	Evaluate surgical and nonsurgical principles of managing common hand and upper extremity problems Not Met
Address common problems and complications associated with distal radius fractures	Address common problems and complications associated with distal radius fractures Significantly Met	Address common problems and complications associated with distal radius fractures Somewhat Met	Address common problems and complications associated with distal radius fractures Not Met
Implement enhanced management of fractures, Dupuytren, and arthritis problems	Implement enhanced management of fractures, Dupuytren, and arthritis problems Significantly Met	Implement enhanced management of fractures, Dupuytren, and arthritis problems Somewhat Met	Implement enhanced management of fractures, Dupuytren, and arthritis problems Not Met
Employ current trends ad techniques in microsurgiccal and soft tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity	Employ current trends ad techniques in microsurgiccal and soft tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity Significantly Met	Employ current trends ad techniques in microsurgiccal and soft tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity Somewhat Met	Employ current trends ad techniques in microsurgiccal and soft tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity Not Met
Apply current concepts for common disorders of hand and upper extremity	Apply current concepts for common disorders of hand and upper extremity Significantly Met	Apply current concepts for common disorders of hand and upper extremity Somewhat Met	Apply current concepts for common disorders of hand and upper extremity Not Met
Develop strategies for the treatment of the shoulder, including rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, and wrist fractures	Develop strategies for the treatment of the shoulder, including rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, and wrist fractures Significantly Met	Develop strategies for the treatment of the shoulder, including rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, and wrist fractures Somewhat Met	Develop strategies for the treatment of the shoulder, including rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, and wrist fractures Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION I: Debates

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All	Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All Excellent	Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All Very Good	Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All Good	Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All Fair	Francisco Rubio, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Volar Plating for All Poor
Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some	Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some Excellent	Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some Very Good	Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some Good	Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some Fair	Philip Blazar, MD - Distal Radius Fractures- Dorsal Plating Better for Some Poor
Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach Excellent	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach Very Good	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach Good	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach Fair	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Volar Approach Poor
Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach	Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach Excellent	Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach Very Good	Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach Good	Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach Fair	Brandon Earp, MD - Scaphoid Waist Fractures- Dorsal Approach Poor
Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft	Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft Excellent	Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft Very Good	Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft Good	Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft Fair	Alfred Hess, MD - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Vascularized Bone Graft Poor
Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft Excellent	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft Very Good	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft Good	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft Fair	Nader Paksima, DO - Scaphoid Proximal Pol Nonunion- Non- Vascularized Bone Graft Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION II: Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures	Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures Excellent	Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures Very Good	Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures Good	Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures Fair	Michael Bednar, MD - Complications with Distal Radius Fractures Poor
Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair	Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair Excellent	Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair Very Good	Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair Good	Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair Fair	Brandon Earp, MD - Complications of Flexor Tendon Repair Poor
Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair	Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair Excellent	Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair Very Good	Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair Good	Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair Fair	Brent Bamberger, DO - Complications of Distal Biceps Repair Poor
Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications	Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications Excellent	Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications Very Good	Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications Good	Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications Fair	Mark Rekant, MD - Nerve Repair How to Avoid Complications Poor
Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art	Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art Excellent	Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art Very Good	Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art Good	Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art Fair	Barry P. Simmons, MD - Rheumatoid Hand Surgery: A Lost Art Poor
Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation	Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation Excellent	Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation Very Good	Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation Good	Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation Fair	Ian Valerio, MD - Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage and Targeted Muscle Renervation Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION II: Debates

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy	Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy Excellent	Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy Very Good	Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy Good	Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy Fair	Brent Bamberger, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Proximal Row Carpectomy Poor
Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion	Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion Excellent	Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion Very Good	Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion Good	Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion Fair	Kristopher Avant, DO - SLAC Wrist with Case Example- Intercarpal Fusion Poor
Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI	Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI Excellent	Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI Very Good	Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI Good	Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI Fair	Michael Bednar, MD - CMC OA With Case Example- LRTI Poor
Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button	Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button Excellent	Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button Very Good	Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button Good	Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button Fair	Kristopher Avant, DO - CMC OA With Case Example- HAD with Suture Button Poor
Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex	Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex Excellent	Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex Very Good	Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex Good	Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex Fair	Philip Blazar, MD - Dupuytren Contracture- Xiaflex Poor
Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery	Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery Excellent	Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery Very Good	Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery Good	Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery Fair	Mark Rekant, MD - Dupuytren Contracture - Surgery Poor
Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction	Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Excellent	Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Very Good	Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Good	Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Fair	Michael Garcia, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Poor
Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty	Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Excellent	Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Very Good	Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Good	Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Fair	Yanni Pappou, MD - Chronic Retraction RCT/ No OA- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Poor

Question Title

* 13. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 14. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 15. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 16. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 17. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 18. Physical Therapists/Occupational Therapists: Please provide your License Number

Question Title

* 19.
PHYSICIANS: FORE is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 12 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS: This course has been approved by the Florida Board of Occupational Therapy (CE Provider # 50-10002). FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 12 CE Hours.

PHYSICAL THERAPISTS: The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide medical education to physicians. Accreditation of this course does not necessarily imply the FPTA supports the views of the presenters or the sponsors. Florida Board of Physical Therapy has approved this activity for 12 CE hours.

Please attest to the number of Credit Hours you've earned below:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakersSESSION I: Debates

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakersSESSION II: Complications

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakersSESSION II: Debates

Question Title

* 13. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 14. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 15. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 16. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 17. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 18. Physical Therapists/Occupational Therapists: Please provide your License Number

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION I: Debates

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION II: Complications

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Frontiers in Upper Extremity Surgery speakers
SESSION II: Debates