5th Annual ICJR Revision Hip & Knee Course

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed, THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty.	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed, THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty. Significantly Met	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed, THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty. Somewhat Met	Discuss clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation of a patient who presents with a painful or failed, THA, hemiarthroplasty, hip resurfacing, TKA, UKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty. Not Met
Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Significantly Met	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Somewhat Met	Evaluate sources of pain to establish a differential diagnosis and discuss appropriate treatment options Not Met
Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc.	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc. Significantly Met	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc. Somewhat Met	Identify potential preoperative problems and challenges and prepare an appropriate preoperative plan, including evaluation of safety of surgical intervention, anticipated blood loss, necessary implants, bone grafts, removal tools, etc. Not Met
Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss, and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss, and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Significantly Met	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss, and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Somewhat Met	Compare and contrast extensile exposure options and options to safely and effectively remove existing prosthetic devices, while minimizing blood and bone loss, and avoiding compromise of motor function, neurovascular injury, or infection Not Met
Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Significantly Met	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Somewhat Met	Discuss the principles necessary to obtain fixation and restore joint stability, kinematics, and function Not Met
Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Significantly Met	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Somewhat Met	Demonstrate removing well-fixed components and cement from cadaveric specimens in addition to extensile approaches, including the extended trochanteric osteotomy and the tibial tubercle osteotomy Not Met
Evaluate reconstructive options which allow management of bone loss with restoration of stability and kinematics	Evaluate reconstructive options which allow management of bone loss with restoration of stability and kinematics Significantly Met	Evaluate reconstructive options which allow management of bone loss with restoration of stability and kinematics Somewhat Met	Evaluate reconstructive options which allow management of bone loss with restoration of stability and kinematics Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION I

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Excellent	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Very Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Fair	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Poor
R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Excellent	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Very Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Fair	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Current Algorithm for Evaluation of MOM Bearings and Taper Corrosion Poor
Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Excellent	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Very Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Fair	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Preoperative Planning: Implant Removal, Bone Loss, Abductor Deficiency, Templating Poor
Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO	Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Excellent	Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Very Good	Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Good	Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Fair	Daniel J. Berry, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Posterior Approach - ETO Poor
Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Excellent	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Very Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Fair	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Video: Extensile Exposure via Direct Lateral Approach -Wagner Transfemoral Osteotomy Poor
David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Excellent	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Very Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Fair	David G. Lewallen, MD - Video: Acetabular Component Removal Techniques Poor
Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Excellent	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Very Good	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Good	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Fair	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Video: Femoral Component Removal Techniques Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION III: Femoral Revision

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview Excellent	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview Very Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview Fair	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Evaluation and management of femoral bone loss, Stem selection - An Overview Poor
Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Excellent	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Very Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Fair	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Femoral Component Revision with Modular Tapered Stems: Video Technique, Pitfalls and Tips Poor
Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Excellent	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Very Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Fair	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Extensively Porous Coated & Cemented Stems - Rare but Indicated for Some Poor
R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Excellent	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Very Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Good	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Fair	R. Michael Meneghini, MD - Massive Segmental Bone Loss - Heavy Metal Replacement Poor
James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter	James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Excellent	James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Very Good	James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Good	James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Fair	James Huddleston, MD - Management of the Tenuous or Fractured Trochanter Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION IV: Acetabular Revision

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Excellent	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Very Good	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Good	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Fair	James A. Browne, MD - Evaluation of Bone Loss and Reconstruction Strategy Overview Poor
Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video)	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Excellent	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Very Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Fair	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Augments (Video) Poor
David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video)	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Excellent	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Very Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Good	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Fair	David G. Lewallen, MD - Bone Defect Management: Highly Porous Metal Cup- Cage (Video) Poor
Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video)	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Excellent	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Very Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Fair	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Bone Defect Management: Custom Tri-Flange (Video) Poor
Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants?	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants? Excellent	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants? Very Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants? Good	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants? Fair	Wayne G. Paprosky, MD - Pelvic discontinuity: Distraction with augments, plates, cages or custom implants? Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION V: THA Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA Excellent	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA Very Good	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA Good	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA Fair	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Evaluation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures after THA Poor
Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention Excellent	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention Very Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention Fair	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Periprosthetic Infection: Diagnosis & Treatment Principles, role for I&D Component Retention Poor
Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique)	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Excellent	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Very Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Good	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Fair	Kevin I. Perry, MD - Two Stage Exchange: Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Spacers (Video Technique) Poor
Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange?	Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange? Excellent	Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange? Very Good	Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange? Good	Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange? Fair	Atul F. Kamath, MD - On the Fringe: Any evidence for single stage or partial two-stage exchange? Poor
Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner	Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Excellent	Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Very Good	Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Good	Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Fair	Mark W. Pagnano, MD - Surgical Management of Instability: Large Head, Dual Mobility or Constrained Liner Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION VII

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA)	David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Excellent	David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Very Good	David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Good	David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Fair	David J. Mayman, MD - Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) Poor
Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc)	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc) Excellent	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc) Very Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc) Good	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc) Fair	Gwo-Chin Lee, MD - Preoperative Planning in Revision TKA (implant choices, bone loss, stems, etc) Poor
Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Excellent	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Very Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Fair	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Optimizing Peri-operative Pain Management During Revision TKA Poor
Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques)	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Excellent	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Very Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Good	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Fair	Keith A. Fehring, MD - Optimizing exposure and Component Removal (Video Techniques) Poor
Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques)	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Excellent	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Very Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Good	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Fair	Thomas K. Fehring, MD - Essential Surgical Steps for Successful Revision TKA (Video Techniques) Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION VIII

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Excellent	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Very Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Good	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Fair	Jeremy M. Gililland, MD - Diaphyseal Press-Fit Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Poor
Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Excellent	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Very Good	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Good	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Fair	Robert T. Trousdale, MD - Cemented/ Hybrid Cemented Stems: Principles and Surgical Technique Poor
Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video)	Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video) Excellent	Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video) Very Good	Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video) Good	Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video) Fair	Atul F. Kamath, MD - Management of Bone Loss: porous tantalum cones (video) Poor
William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video)	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video) Excellent	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video) Very Good	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video) Good	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video) Fair	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Bone Loss: stepped modular sleeves (video) Poor
Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video)	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video) Excellent	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video) Very Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video) Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video) Fair	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Management of Bone Loss: lobed porous titanium cones (video) Poor
Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Excellent	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Very Good	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Good	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Fair	Viktor E. Krebs, MD - Rotating Hinge Revision TKA: Indications and Surgical Principles Poor
Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples	Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Excellent	Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Very Good	Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Good	Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Fair	Michael D. Ries, MD - Modular Tumor-Type Hinge Prostheses - Principles and Case Examples Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION X: TKA Complications

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Excellent	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Very Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Good	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Fair	Bryan D. Springer, MD - Diagnosis and Management of Peri-prosthetic Knee Infection: An Overview Poor
Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications Excellent	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications Very Good	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications Good	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications Fair	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Component Retention: Indications Poor
Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video)	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video) Excellent	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video) Very Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video) Good	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video) Fair	Michael J. Taunton, MD - Two-stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Articulating Spacers: surgical Technique Video) Poor
Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique)	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Excellent	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Very Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Good	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Fair	Tad M. Mabry, MD - Two-Stage Reimplantation for Infected TKA (Static Spacers: Surgical Video Technique) Poor
George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Excellent	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Very Good	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Good	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Fair	George G. Haidukewych, MD - Management of Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA Poor
Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Excellent	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Very Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Good	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Fair	Michael P. Bolognesi, MD - Management of Patella Fractures After TKA Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION XII: Extensor Mechanism

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Excellent	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Very Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Good	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Fair	Richard W. McCalden, MD - Patellar Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management Poor
Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Excellent	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Very Good	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Good	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Fair	Charles L. Nelson, MD - Management of Patellar Bone Loss During Revision TKA Poor
James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video)	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Excellent	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Very Good	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Good	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Fair	James A. Browne, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Marlex Mesh (Surgical Technique Video) Poor
William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video)	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Excellent	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Very Good	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Good	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Fair	William L. Griffin, MD - Management of Chronic Extensor Mechanism Injury: Extensor Mech Allograft (Surgical Video) Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course
speakers SESSION XIII: Miscellaneous

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management	David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Excellent	David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Very Good	David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Good	David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Fair	David J. Mayman, MD - Metal Hypersensitivity in TKA: Current State of Evaluation and Management Poor
Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Excellent	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Very Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Good	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Fair	Arlen D. Hanssen, MD - Evaluation and Surgical Management of Flexion Instability Poor
Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Excellent	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Very Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Good	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Fair	Matthew P. Abdel, MD - Revision TKA for Arthrofibrosis: Etiologies and Surgical Treatment Poor
James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only?	James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Excellent	James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Very Good	James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Good	James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Fair	James Huddleston, MD - Osteolysis: Is There Any Indication for Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting Only? Poor
Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Excellent	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Very Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Good	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Fair	Rafael J. Sierra, MD - Revision of Failed Unicompartmental to TKA: Technique and Pearls with Video Poor

Question Title

* 19. Please comment on the effectiveness of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course. What improvements would you like made to the presentations?

Question Title

* 20. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 21. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 22. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 23. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 24. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 25. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education (FORE) and International Congress for Joint Reconstruction (ICJR). FORE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 15.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest below to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 15.5) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION I

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION III: Femoral Revision

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION IV: Acetabular Revision

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION V: THA Complications

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION VII

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION VIII

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION X: TKA Complications

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakersSESSION XII: Extensor Mechanism

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers SESSION XIII: Miscellaneous

Question Title

* 19. Please comment on the effectiveness of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course. What improvements would you like made to the presentations?

Question Title

* 20. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 21. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 22. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 23. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 24. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION I

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION III: Femoral Revision

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION IV: Acetabular Revision

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION V: THA Complications

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION VII

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION VIII

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION X: TKA Complications

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course speakers
SESSION XII: Extensor Mechanism

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 5th Annual Revision Hip & Knee course
speakers SESSION XIII: Miscellaneous